Joos S K, Hickam D H, Gordon G H, Baker L H
Health Services Research and Development Program, Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, OR 97207, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 1996 Mar;11(3):147-55. doi: 10.1007/BF02600266.
To determine whether an intervention designed to improve patient-physician communication increases the frequency with which physicians elicit patients' concerns, changes other communication behaviors, and improves health care outcomes.
Pretest-posttest design with random assignment of physicians to intervention or control groups.
General medicine clinics of a university-affiliated Veterans Affairs Hospital.
PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Forty-two physicians and 348 continuity care patients taking prescription medications for chronic medical conditions.
Intervention group physicians received 4.5 hours of training on eliciting and responding to patients' concerns and requests, and their patients filled out the Patient Requests for Services Questionnaire prior to a subsequent clinic visit. Control group physicians received 4.5 hours of training in medical decision-making.
The frequency with which physicians elicited all of a patient's concerns increased in the intervention group as compared with the control group (p = .032). Patients perceptions of the amount of information received from the physician did increase significantly (p < .05), but the actual magnitude of change was small. A measure of patient satisfaction with the physicians was high at baseline and also showed no significant change after the intervention. Likewise, the intervention was not associated with changes in patient compliance with medications or appointments, nor were there any effects on outpatient utilization.
A low-intensity intervention changed physician behavior but had no effect on patient outcomes such as satisfaction, compliance, or utilization. Interventions may need to focus on physicians and patients to have the greatest effect.
确定一项旨在改善医患沟通的干预措施是否会增加医生询问患者担忧的频率,改变其他沟通行为,并改善医疗保健结果。
采用前测-后测设计,将医生随机分配到干预组或对照组。
一所大学附属退伍军人事务医院的普通内科门诊。
患者/参与者:42名医生和348名患有慢性疾病并正在服用处方药的连续性护理患者。
干预组医生接受了4.5小时关于询问和回应患者担忧及请求的培训,他们的患者在随后的门诊就诊前填写了《患者服务请求问卷》。对照组医生接受了4.5小时的医疗决策培训。
与对照组相比,干预组医生询问患者所有担忧的频率有所增加(p = 0.032)。患者对从医生那里获得的信息量的感知确实显著增加(p < 0.05),但实际变化幅度很小。患者对医生的满意度在基线时较高,干预后也没有显著变化。同样,该干预与患者对药物治疗或预约的依从性变化无关,对门诊利用率也没有任何影响。
一项低强度干预改变了医生的行为,但对患者满意度、依从性或利用率等患者结果没有影响。干预措施可能需要同时关注医生和患者,才能产生最大效果。