Knudsen K M, Aaby P, Whittle H, Rowe M, Samb B, Simondon F, Sterne J, Fine P
Epidemiology Research Unit, Danish Epidemiology Science Centre, Staten Seruminstitut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Int J Epidemiol. 1996 Jun;25(3):665-73. doi: 10.1093/ije/25.3.665.
The World Health Organization (WHO) recommended the use of high titre measles vaccine in 1989. Subsequent long term follow-up of several trials yielded results suggesting higher mortality among children inoculated with medium and high titre vaccines compared to standard titre vaccines, although none of the individual trials found significant differences in mortality.
Long term survival after standard, medium and high titre measles vaccines has been investigated in a combined analysis of all West African trials with mortality data. In trials from Guinea-Bissau, The Gambia and Senegal, children received medium or high titre vaccines from 4 months of age and were compared to control groups recruited at the same time later receiving standard titre vaccine from 9 months of age. All children were followed up to at least 3 years old.
Combining trials of high titre vaccines showed higher mortality among the high titre group compared to the standard group: mortality ratio (MR) = 1.33 (95% CI : 1.02-1. 73). Mortality among recipients of medium titre vaccines was not different from that in the standard vaccine group, MR = 1.11 (95% CI: 0.54-2.27). In a combined analysis by sex, the adjusted mortality ratios comparing high titre vaccine with standard vaccine were 1.86 (95% CI : 1.28-2.70) for females and 0.91 (95% CI : 0.61-1.35) for males. The trials were not designed to study long term mortality. Adjustments for several possible sources of bias did not alter the results.
The combined analysis showed a decreased survival related to high titre measles vaccine compared with standard titre vaccines, though solely among females. As a result of these studies from West Africa and a study from Haiti, WHO has recommended that high titre measles vaccine no longer be used.
世界卫生组织(WHO)于1989年建议使用高滴度麻疹疫苗。随后对多项试验的长期随访结果表明,与标准滴度疫苗相比,接种中、高滴度疫苗的儿童死亡率更高,尽管没有任何一项单独试验发现死亡率存在显著差异。
通过对所有有死亡率数据的西非试验进行综合分析,研究了标准、中、高滴度麻疹疫苗接种后的长期存活率。在几内亚比绍、冈比亚和塞内加尔的试验中,儿童从4个月大开始接种中或高滴度疫苗,并与同时招募的对照组进行比较,对照组在9个月大时接种标准滴度疫苗。所有儿童均随访至至少3岁。
高滴度疫苗试验合并分析显示,高滴度组的死亡率高于标准组:死亡率比(MR)=1.33(95%可信区间:1.02 - 1.73)。中滴度疫苗接种者的死亡率与标准疫苗组无差异,MR = 1.11(95%可信区间:0.54 - 2.27)。按性别进行的综合分析中,高滴度疫苗与标准疫苗相比的调整后死亡率比,女性为1.86(95%可信区间:1.28 - 2.70),男性为0.91(95%可信区间:0.61 - 1.35)。这些试验并非设计用于研究长期死亡率。对几种可能的偏倚来源进行调整后,结果未改变。
综合分析显示,与标准滴度疫苗相比,高滴度麻疹疫苗的存活率降低,不过仅在女性中如此。由于西非的这些研究以及海地的一项研究,WHO已建议不再使用高滴度麻疹疫苗。