Denesvre C, Carrington C, Corbin A, Takeuchi Y, Cosset F L, Schulz T, Sitbon M, Sonigo P
Génétique des Virus, ICGM-CNRS UPR415, Institut Cochin de GénétiqueMoléculaire, France.
J Virol. 1996 Jul;70(7):4380-6. doi: 10.1128/JVI.70.7.4380-4386.1996.
We investigated the influence of transmembrane protein (TM) domains on incorporation of retroviral envelopes into virions and on infectivity. We introduced complete, truncated, or chimeric Friend murine leukemia virus (F-MuLV) and human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 (HTLV-1) envelopes into an MuLV particle-producing complementation cell line. As shown previously for HTLV-1 envelopes containing extracellular domains of F-MuLV TM (C. Denesvre, P. Sonigo, A. Corbin, H. Ellerbrok, and M. Sitbon, J. Virol. 69:4149-4157, 1995), reverse chimeric F-MuLV envelopes containing the extracellular domain of HTLV-1 TM were not processed. In contrast, a chimeric MuLV envelope containing the entire HTLV membrane-spanning and cytoplasmic domains (FHTMi) was efficiently processed, fusogenic as tested in a cell-to-cell assay, and efficiently incorporated into MuLV particles. However, these MuLV particles bearing FHTMi envelope proteins could not infect mouse or rat cells which are susceptible to wild-type F-MuLV. Therefore, envelopes which are readily fusogenic in cell-to-cell assays and also efficiently incorporated into virions may not necessarily confer virus-to-cell fusogenicity. HTLV envelopes, whether parental, chimeric (containing the MuLV cytoplasmic tail) or with a truncated cytoplasmic domain, were incorporated into MuLV particles with equal efficiencies, indicating that the cytoplasmic tails of these envelopes did not determine their incorporation into virions. In contrast to FHTMi envelope, HTLV-1 envelopes with F-MuLV membrane-spanning and cytoplasmic domains, as well as wild-type HTLV-1 envelopes, conferred virion infectivity. These results help to define requirements for envelope incorporation into retroviral particles and their cell-free infectivity.
我们研究了跨膜蛋白(TM)结构域对逆转录病毒包膜掺入病毒粒子及感染性的影响。我们将完整、截短或嵌合的Friend小鼠白血病病毒(F-MuLV)和1型人类T细胞白血病病毒(HTLV-1)包膜导入一个产生MuLV粒子的互补细胞系中。如先前针对含有F-MuLV TM胞外结构域的HTLV-1包膜所显示的那样(C. 德内斯夫尔、P. 索尼戈、A. 科尔班、H. 埃勒布罗克和M. 西特邦,《病毒学杂志》69:4149 - 4157, 1995),含有HTLV-1 TM胞外结构域的反向嵌合F-MuLV包膜未被加工。相比之下,含有整个HTLV跨膜和胞质结构域的嵌合MuLV包膜(FHTMi)被高效加工,在细胞间测定中具有融合活性,并高效掺入MuLV粒子中。然而,这些带有FHTMi包膜蛋白的MuLV粒子无法感染对野生型F-MuLV敏感的小鼠或大鼠细胞。因此,在细胞间测定中易于融合且高效掺入病毒粒子的包膜不一定能赋予病毒与细胞之间的融合活性。HTLV包膜,无论是亲本型、嵌合型(含有MuLV胞质尾)还是截短了胞质结构域的,都以相同效率掺入MuLV粒子,这表明这些包膜的胞质尾并不能决定它们掺入病毒粒子的情况。与FHTMi包膜不同,具有F-MuLV跨膜和胞质结构域的HTLV-1包膜以及野生型HTLV-1包膜赋予了病毒粒子感染性。这些结果有助于明确包膜掺入逆转录病毒粒子的要求及其无细胞感染性。