• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项足月胎膜剥脱术促进分娩的随机对照试验。

A randomized controlled trial of membrane stripping at term to promote labor.

作者信息

Wiriyasirivaj B, Vutyavanich T, Ruangsri R A

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Thailand.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 1996 May;87(5 Pt 1):767-70. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(96)00015-4.

DOI:10.1016/0029-7844(96)00015-4
PMID:8677083
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effectiveness of membrane stripping at term to promote the onset of labor.

METHODS

One hundred twenty gravidas at 38 weeks' gestation, who were attending an antenatal clinic and planned to deliver at Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai University Hospital in northern Thailand, were assigned randomly to one of two groups. One group had weekly pelvic examinations only, and the other also had membrane stripping, beginning at 38 weeks' gestation and continuing until the onset of labor or until 42 completed weeks' gestation. Outcome measures included the proportion of patients who delivered with 7 days after the first examination, Bishop scores among those who did not deliver, days from the first examination to delivery, incidence of postterm pregnancy, and maternal and fetal complication.

RESULTS

Twenty-five of 61 patients (41%) assigned to membrane stripping delivered within 1 week, compared with 12 of 59 controls (20.3%), a statistically significant difference (P = .014). There was also a statistically significant difference (P = .013, Mann-Whitney U test) in the Bishop scores among those who did not deliver within 1 week (4 +/- 2.5 versus 2.6 +/- 1.7 in the study and control groups, respectively). A significant difference was also observed with respect to the mean number of days to delivery (8.8 +/- 6.7 versus 13.6 +/- 7.5, respectively; P < .001). The incidence of postterm pregnancy was one of 61 (1.6%) and three of 59 (5.1%) in the stripping and control groups, respectively. No significant differences were observed in maternal and fetal complications.

CONCLUSION

Membrane stripping is safe and effective in promoting the onset of labor at term.

摘要

目的

确定足月时人工剥膜促进分娩发动的有效性。

方法

120名妊娠38周的孕妇,她们在泰国北部清迈大学玛哈拉吉那空医院产前门诊就诊并计划在该院分娩,被随机分为两组。一组仅每周进行一次骨盆检查,另一组从妊娠38周开始也进行人工剥膜,持续至分娩发动或至妊娠满42周。观察指标包括首次检查后7天内分娩的患者比例、未分娩者的Bishop评分、首次检查至分娩的天数、过期妊娠发生率以及母婴并发症。

结果

61名接受人工剥膜的患者中有25名(41%)在1周内分娩,而59名对照组患者中有12名(20.3%),差异有统计学意义(P = .014)。在1周内未分娩者中,Bishop评分也有统计学差异(P = .013,Mann-Whitney U检验)(研究组和对照组分别为4 ± 2.5和2.6 ± 1.7)。在平均分娩天数方面也观察到显著差异(分别为8.8 ± 6.7和13.6 ± 7.5;P < .001)。剥膜组和对照组的过期妊娠发生率分别为61例中的1例(1.6%)和59例中的3例(5.1%)。母婴并发症方面未观察到显著差异。

结论

人工剥膜在促进足月分娩发动方面安全有效。

相似文献

1
A randomized controlled trial of membrane stripping at term to promote labor.一项足月胎膜剥脱术促进分娩的随机对照试验。
Obstet Gynecol. 1996 May;87(5 Pt 1):767-70. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(96)00015-4.
2
A comparative study of membrane stripping and nonstripping for induction of labor in uncomplicated term pregnancy.未足月单胎妊娠引产中胎膜早破与未破的比较研究
J Med Assoc Thai. 1999 Mar;82(3):229-33.
3
Safety and efficacy of stripping of membranes at term.足月胎膜剥脱术的安全性与有效性。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1998 Feb;60(2):115-21. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7292(97)00249-x.
4
The effectiveness of sweeping membranes at term: a randomized trial.
Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Apr;89(4):586-90. doi: 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00004-5.
5
Effect of membrane sweeping at term pregnancy on duration of pregnancy and labor induction: a randomized trial.足月妊娠时人工破膜对妊娠持续时间和引产的影响:一项随机试验
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2006;62(1):41-4. doi: 10.1159/000091842. Epub 2006 Mar 3.
6
Membrane stripping to prevent post-term pregnancy in Enugu, Nigeria: a randomized controlled trial.尼日利亚埃努古地区采用膜剥脱术预防过期妊娠的随机对照试验。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014 Jan;289(1):29-34. doi: 10.1007/s00404-013-2918-5. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
7
Stripping of membranes as a safe method to reduce prolonged pregnancies.胎膜剥脱术作为一种减少过期妊娠的安全方法。
Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Jun;87(6):927-31. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(96)00046-4.
8
Stretching of the cervix and stripping of the membranes at term: a randomised controlled study.足月时宫颈扩张及胎膜剥脱:一项随机对照研究。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1996 Jun;66(2):129-32. doi: 10.1016/0301-2115(96)02405-0.
9
Stripping membranes at term: can it safely reduce the incidence of post-term pregnancies?足月时人工剥膜:能否安全降低过期妊娠的发生率?
Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Oct;76(4):678-80.
10
Management of pregnancies beyond forty-one weeks' gestation with an unfavorable cervix.宫颈条件不佳的孕41周以上妊娠的管理。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Jun;178(6):1279-87. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70334-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Membrane sweeping in term pregnancy to promote spontaneous labor and prevent post-term pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.足月妊娠时行人工剥膜以促进自然分娩并预防过期妊娠:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Sep 24;25(1):940. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-08098-7.
2
A Secondary Analysis of the LILAC Study Regarding Cesarean Birth by Maternal Request in Women Living with HIV.关于HIV感染女性因产妇要求进行剖宫产的LILAC研究的二次分析。
J Womens Health Dev. 2021 Jun 16;4(2):78-81. doi: 10.26502/fjwhd.2644-28840062.
3
Membrane sweeping for induction of labour.
人工破膜引产
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Feb 27;2(2):CD000451. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000451.pub3.
4
Use of labour induction and risk of cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.引产的使用与剖宫产风险:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
CMAJ. 2014 Jun 10;186(9):665-73. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.130925. Epub 2014 Apr 28.
5
Randomized clinical trial evaluating the frequency of membrane sweeping with an unfavorable cervix at 39 weeks.随机临床试验评估 39 周时宫颈条件不佳行胎膜剥膜术的频率。
Int J Womens Health. 2011;3:287-94. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S23436. Epub 2011 Aug 19.
6
Membrane sweeping for induction of labour.人工破膜引产
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jan 25;2005(1):CD000451. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000451.pub2.