Suppr超能文献

[产科集中化:利弊]

[Centralization in obstetrics: pros and cons].

作者信息

Roemer V M, Ramb S

机构信息

Frauenklinik des Klinikums Lippe-Detmold.

出版信息

Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol. 1996 Jan-Feb;200(1):2-12.

PMID:8681127
Abstract

Possible advantages and disadvantages of a general centralization of German obstetric facilities are analysed in the study. The need for centralization of risk cases, especially premature births (regionalization) is pointed out. Centralization appears appropriate, since every fifth maternity unit in Germany (19.78%) has 300 or fewer deliveries per year. This one fifth of perinatal clinics accounts for 6.3% of all deliveries (N = 49450). There are appreciable differences between the old and new federal states (Bundesländer): in the recently acceded federal states, 48.7% of all perinatal clinics have deliveries of 300 and less per year. This group of perinatal clinics accounts for 29% of all deliveries in the new federal states. We have carried out a survey of the mother's attitude to centralization: out of 416 patients in the Detmold women's hospital whose mean age was 29.0 +/- 4.2 years, 90.4% were not in favor of general centralization of obstetrics. 43% were also against a centralization of risk cases (regionalization). 75% of the women surveyed objected to centralized obstetrics because of the 'possible absence of the family', the 'possible absence of students and trainees' (44.9%), the 'unfamiliarity with staff and premises' (41.8%) and 'fear of anonymity' (44.5%). The majority of all women (84.1%) did not want to have a drive more than 20 km to an obstetrics center. Fear of 'delivery in a taxi'(78.6%), the 'fear that the husband will come too late to the delivery' (65.4%) and that the 'overall course of the delivery might not be adequate for reasons of time'. The presence of a pediatrics department in conjunction with the perinatal clinic was rated very positively (93%). It is concluded from the data and further juridical considerations that centralization of risk cases (regionalization) is indispensable in the near future and that somewhat more further into the future decentralization should be carried out by closing obstetrics departments with substantially less than 350 deliveries per year. Attention is drawn to some consequences of such a structural reform which will probably have to be initiated by the German Association of Gynecologists and Obstetricians.

摘要

该研究分析了德国产科设施全面集中化可能存在的优缺点。指出了集中处理风险病例,尤其是早产病例(区域化)的必要性。集中化似乎是合适的,因为德国每五个产科单位(19.78%)每年的分娩量为300例或更少。这五分之一的围产期诊所占所有分娩量的6.3%(N = 49450)。新旧联邦州之间存在明显差异:在最近加入的联邦州,48.7%的围产期诊所每年分娩量为300例及以下。这组围产期诊所占新联邦州所有分娩量的29%。我们对母亲对集中化的态度进行了调查:在代特莫尔德妇女医院的416名患者中,平均年龄为29.0 +/- 4.2岁,90.4%的人不赞成产科全面集中化。43%的人也反对风险病例的集中化(区域化)。75%接受调查的女性反对集中产科,原因是“可能没有家人陪伴”、“可能没有学生和实习生”(44.9%)、“不熟悉工作人员和场所”(41.8%)以及“害怕匿名”(44.5%)。大多数女性(84.1%)不想开车超过20公里去产科中心。担心“在出租车里分娩”(78.6%)、“担心丈夫到分娩时来得太晚”(65.4%)以及“由于时间原因分娩的整个过程可能不充分”。围产期诊所配备儿科部门得到了非常积极的评价(93%)。从数据和进一步的法律考虑得出结论,在不久的将来,风险病例的集中化(区域化)是必不可少的,并且在更远的将来,应该通过关闭每年分娩量大幅少于350例的产科部门来进行一定程度的分散化。提请注意这种结构改革可能带来的一些后果,这可能需要德国妇产科医生协会发起。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验