Muris P, Merckelbach H, Horselenberg R
Department of Experimental Abnormal Psychology, Limburg University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Behav Res Ther. 1996 May-Jun;34(5-6):501-13. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(96)00005-8.
The White Bear Suppression Inventory [WBSI; Wegner, D.M. & Zanakos, S. (1994), Journal of Personality, 62, 615-640] is a self-report questionnaire measuring people's general tendency to suppress unwanted negative thoughts. The current article describes two studies investigating the reliability, factor structure, validity, and correlates of the WBSI. Study 1 (n = 172) showed that the WBSI is a reliable instrument in terms of internal consistency and test-retest stability. Factor analyses of the WBSI revealed a 1-factor solution. Furthermore, the WBSI was found to correlate positively with measures of emotional vulnerability and psychopathological symptoms. In Study 2 (n = 40), the relationship between WBSI and levels of intrusive thinking was examined in more detail, using a thought suppression task. In general, results of this thought suppression experiment provided evidence for the validity of the WBSI. That is, subjects with high WBSI scores exhibited higher frequencies of unwanted intrusive thoughts than subjects with low WBSI scores.
白熊抑制量表[WBSI;韦格纳,D.M. & 扎纳科斯,S.(1994年),《人格杂志》,62卷,615 - 640页]是一份自我报告问卷,用于测量人们抑制 unwanted 负面想法的总体倾向。本文描述了两项研究,调查了WBSI的信度、因素结构、效度及相关因素。研究1(n = 172)表明,就内部一致性和重测稳定性而言,WBSI是一种可靠的工具。对WBSI的因素分析揭示了一个单因素解决方案。此外,发现WBSI与情绪易感性和精神病理症状的测量指标呈正相关。在研究2(n = 40)中,使用思维抑制任务更详细地研究了WBSI与侵入性思维水平之间的关系。总体而言,这项思维抑制实验的结果为WBSI的效度提供了证据。也就是说,WBSI得分高的受试者比WBSI得分低的受试者表现出更高频率的 unwanted 侵入性思维。