• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

特殊教育的有效性:安置是关键因素吗?

Effectiveness of special education: is placement the critical factor?

作者信息

Hocutt A M

机构信息

Department of Educational and Psychological Studies at the University of Miami, USA.

出版信息

Future Child. 1996 Spring;6(1):77-102.

PMID:8689263
Abstract

Research indicates that various program models, implemented both in special education and general education, can have moderately positive academic and social impacts for students with disabilities. However, no intervention has been designed that eliminates the impact of having a disability. With few exceptions, students with disabilities have not achieved commensurately with their nondisabled peers; even students with learning disabilities as a group have not been able to achieve at the level of low-achieving nondisabled students. In general, the most effective interventions for students with disabilities, whether in special education or general education settings, have employed intensive and reasonably individualized instruction, combined with careful, frequent monitoring of student progress. There is no compelling evidence that placement rather than instruction is the critical factor in student academic or social success. Further, studies have indicated that typical practice in general education is substantially different from practice in the model programs that showed greatest success for students with disabilities. The interventions that were effective in improving academic outcomes for students with disabilities required a considerable investment of resources, including time and effort, as well as extensive support for teachers. The research does not support full-time inclusion for all students with disabilities. On the contrary, it appears that there is a clear need for special education. At the same time, given adequate resources, schools should be able to assist more students to be more successful in general education settings.

摘要

研究表明,在特殊教育和普通教育中实施的各种项目模式,对残疾学生可能会产生一定程度的积极学业和社交影响。然而,尚未设计出能消除残疾影响的干预措施。除了少数例外情况,残疾学生的成绩未能与其非残疾同龄人相匹配;即使是学习障碍学生群体,也未能达到成绩较差的非残疾学生的水平。总体而言,对残疾学生最有效的干预措施,无论是在特殊教育还是普通教育环境中,都采用了强化且合理个性化的教学,并结合对学生进步的仔细、频繁监测。没有确凿证据表明安置方式而非教学才是学生学业或社交成功的关键因素。此外,研究表明,普通教育中的常规做法与对残疾学生显示出最大成功的示范项目中的做法有很大不同。对残疾学生有效的提高学业成绩的干预措施需要大量资源投入,包括时间和精力,以及对教师的广泛支持。该研究并不支持让所有残疾学生都全时融入普通教育。相反,似乎显然需要特殊教育。与此同时,如果有足够的资源,学校应该能够帮助更多学生在普通教育环境中取得更大成功。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of special education: is placement the critical factor?特殊教育的有效性:安置是关键因素吗?
Future Child. 1996 Spring;6(1):77-102.
2
Disability and the education system.残疾与教育体系。
Future Child. 2012 Spring;22(1):97-122. doi: 10.1353/foc.2012.0007.
3
Special education for students with disabilities: analysis and recommendations.残疾学生的特殊教育:分析与建议
Future Child. 1996 Spring;6(1):4-24.
4
Special education for intellectual disability: current trends and perspectives.智力残疾的特殊教育:当前趋势与展望。
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2009 Sep;22(5):452-6. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e32832eb5c3.
5
Identification and assessment of students with disabilities.残疾学生的识别与评估。
Future Child. 1996 Spring;6(1):40-53.
6
Mainstreaming children with handicaps: implications for pediatricians.残疾儿童融入主流:对儿科医生的影响。
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1989 Jun;10(3):151-6.
7
Title I--improving the academic achievement of the disadvantaged; Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA)--assistance to states for the education of children with disabilities. Final regulations.第一章——提高弱势群体的学业成绩;《残疾人教育法》(IDEA)——向各州提供的用于残疾儿童教育的援助。最终规定。
Fed Regist. 2007 Apr 9;72(67):17747-81.
8
Educational psychology and the effectiveness of inclusive education/mainstreaming.教育心理学与全纳教育/主流化的有效性
Br J Educ Psychol. 2007 Mar;77(Pt 1):1-24. doi: 10.1348/000709906X156881.
9
According to their peers: inclusion as high school students see it.在同龄人看来:高中生眼中的包容。
Ment Retard. 1999 Dec;37(6):458-67. doi: 10.1352/0047-6765(1999)037<0458:ATTPIA>2.0.CO;2.
10
A meta-analysis of the effects of placement on academic and social skill outcome measures of students with disabilities.一项关于安置对残疾学生学业和社交技能成果测量影响的荟萃分析。
Res Dev Disabil. 2015 Dec;47:80-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2015.08.014. Epub 2015 Sep 4.

引用本文的文献

1
A (mis)guidance of disabled youth: Post-secondary schooling transition experiences in South Africa.对残疾青年的(错误)引导:南非高等教育过渡经历
Afr J Disabil. 2023 Nov 14;12:1293. doi: 10.4102/ajod.v12i0.1293. eCollection 2023.
2
Childhood Placement in Special Education and Adult Well-Being.儿童在特殊教育中的安置与成人幸福感
J Spec Educ. 2016 Aug;50(2):109-120. doi: 10.1177/0022466915624413. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
3
Early intensive behavioral intervention: emergence of a consumer-driven service model.早期强化行为干预:一种由消费者驱动的服务模式的出现。
Behav Anal. 2000 Fall;23(2):149-71. doi: 10.1007/BF03392008.
4
Impact of the Good Behavior Game, a universal classroom-based behavior intervention, on young adult service use for problems with emotions, behavior, or drugs or alcohol.良好行为游戏是一种基于课堂的普遍行为干预措施,它对年轻人因情绪、行为、药物或酒精问题而使用服务的情况产生的影响。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008 Jun 1;95 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S29-44. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.10.009. Epub 2008 Feb 4.