Suppr超能文献

多发性硬化症生活质量量表功能评估的验证

Validation of the functional assessment of multiple sclerosis quality of life instrument.

作者信息

Cella D F, Dineen K, Arnason B, Reder A, Webster K A, karabatsos G, Chang C, Lloyd S, Steward J, Stefoski D

机构信息

Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Neurology. 1996 Jul;47(1):129-39. doi: 10.1212/wnl.47.1.129.

Abstract

Based on scientific literature and interviews with clinicians and patients, we developed a quality of life instrument for use with people with MS called the Functional Assessment of Multiple Sclerosis (FAMS). The initial item pool consisted of 88 questions: 28 from the general version of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy quality of life instrument, plus 60 generated by patients, providers, and literature review. The validation samples comprised a mail survey cohort (N = 377) and a clinical cohort (N = 56). Both cohorts provides evidence for internal consistency of the derived subscales, test-retest reliability, content validity, concurrent validity, and construct validity. Principal components and Rasch measurement model analyses were applied sequentially to survey sample data, reducing test length to 44 questions, divided into six subscales: mobility, symptoms, emotional well-being (depression), general contentment, thinking/fatigue, and family/social well-being. Fifteen initially rejected questions were added back as miscellaneous (unscored) questions for their potential clinical and empirical value. The mobility subscale was strongly predictive of the Kurtzke Extended Disability Status Scale and the Scripps Neurologic Rating Scales. The other five subscales were not, indicating they measure aspects of patient quality of life not captured by the neurologic exam. The final 59-item English language instrument (FAMS version 2) is available for inclusion in clinical trials and clinical practice.

摘要

基于科学文献以及对临床医生和患者的访谈,我们开发了一种用于多发性硬化症患者的生活质量评估工具,称为多发性硬化症功能评估量表(FAMS)。最初的项目库包含88个问题:28个来自癌症治疗功能评估生活质量量表通用版,另外60个是由患者、医疗服务提供者以及文献综述生成的。验证样本包括一个邮寄调查队列(N = 377)和一个临床队列(N = 56)。两个队列都为所衍生子量表的内部一致性、重测信度、内容效度、同时效度和结构效度提供了证据。主成分分析和拉施测量模型分析依次应用于调查样本数据,将测试长度缩减至44个问题,分为六个子量表:活动能力、症状、情绪健康(抑郁)、总体满意度、思维/疲劳以及家庭/社会健康。15个最初被剔除的问题因其潜在临床和实证价值作为杂项(不计分)问题重新纳入。活动能力子量表对库尔茨克扩展残疾状态量表和斯克里普斯神经学评定量表具有很强的预测性。其他五个子量表则不然,这表明它们测量的是神经学检查未涵盖的患者生活质量方面。最终的59项英语语言工具(FAMS第2版)可用于纳入临床试验和临床实践。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验