Surprenant A M, Neath I
Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907-1364, USA.
Mem Cognit. 1996 May;24(3):356-66. doi: 10.3758/bf03213299.
People remember lists of vowel-contrasting syllables better than lists that vary only in stop consonant identity. Most views suggest that this difference is due to the structure of immediate memory and the greater discriminability of vowels compared with consonants. In all of these views, there is a presumed systematic relationship between discriminability and recall so that the more discriminable an item, the better that item should be recalled. The 11 experiments reported here measured the relative discriminability of and compared serial recall for (1) intact syllables that varied only in the medial vowel, (2) intact syllables that varied only in the initial consonant, and (3) syllables with the center vowel replaced by silence (so-called silent-center vowels). When item discriminability, as measured by identification, was equated for consonant-contrasting and silent-center lists, serial recall performance was also equal. However, even when the vowels were less discriminable than the consonants or silent-center vowels, serial recall performance for the vowels was still better. These results are problematic for theories based on acoustic discriminability but can be explained parsimoniously by Nairne's (1990) feature model.
比起仅在塞音特征上有差异的音节列表,人们对包含元音对比的音节列表的记忆效果更好。大多数观点认为,这种差异是由于即时记忆的结构以及元音相较于辅音具有更高的可辨别性。在所有这些观点中,可辨别性与回忆之间存在一种假定的系统关系,即一个项目的可辨别性越高,它被回忆起来的效果就越好。这里报告的11个实验测量了以下三种情况的相对可辨别性并比较了系列回忆:(1)仅在中间元音上有差异的完整音节,(2)仅在初始辅音上有差异的完整音节,以及(3)中间元音被静音替代的音节(即所谓的静音中心元音)。当通过识别测量的项目可辨别性在辅音对比列表和静音中心列表中相等时,系列回忆表现也相等。然而,即使元音的可辨别性低于辅音或静音中心元音,元音的系列回忆表现仍然更好。这些结果对于基于声学可辨别性的理论来说是有问题的,但可以由奈尔恩(1990)的特征模型简洁地解释。