Suppr超能文献

使用单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPET)通过N-异丙基-p-[123I]碘安非他明测量脑血流量时,无论其从脑组织中的洗脱情况如何,微球模型都能适用吗?

Can the microsphere model by applied to cerebral blood flow measurement using N-isopropyl-p-[123I]iodoamphetamine with SPET regardless of washout from brain tissue?

作者信息

Ohkubo M, Odano I, Takahashi N, Sakai K

机构信息

Department of Radiological Technology, College of Biomedical Technology, Niigata University, Japan.

出版信息

Nucl Med Commun. 1995 Dec;16(12):1026-33. doi: 10.1097/00006231-199512000-00007.

Abstract

The microsphere model and the continuous withdrawal of arterial blood have commonly been used in clinical studies when measuring regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) by N-isopropyl-p-[123I]iodoamphetamine (IMP) single photon emission tomography. The method is considered to underestimate rCBF because of the washout of tracer from brain tissue; however, the extent of this underestimation is not known. To assess whether this underestimation can be determined quantitatively, we performed simulation analysis based on the microsphere model and the two-compartment model [influx, K1(rCBF); and outflux, k2(washout)] using the time-activity curves of 123I-IMP in arterial blood [Ca(t)] of 10 subjects. With the microsphere method, rCBF values fell as time post-injection increased. The extent of underestimation of rCBF was 4.7 +/- 0.28% (mean +/- S.D.) at 5 min, 10.2 +/- 0.42% at 10 min and 15.2 +/- 0.55% at 15 min. There was little variation in the extent of underestimation and it was not dependent on the Ca(t) of the subjects. We therefore considered the results to be generally applicable to various studies of the microsphere model. As 4.7% is considered to be negligible in clinical studies, we conclude that the microsphere model can be applied to obtain accurate measurement of rCBF up to 5 min regardless of washout.

摘要

当通过N-异丙基-p-[123I]碘安非他明(IMP)单光子发射断层扫描测量局部脑血流量(rCBF)时,微球模型和动脉血连续抽取法常用于临床研究。由于示踪剂从脑组织中洗脱,该方法被认为会低估rCBF;然而,这种低估的程度尚不清楚。为了评估这种低估是否可以定量确定,我们使用10名受试者动脉血[Ca(t)]中123I-IMP的时间-活性曲线,基于微球模型和两室模型[流入,K1(rCBF);流出,k2(洗脱)]进行了模拟分析。采用微球法时,rCBF值随注射后时间的增加而下降。rCBF的低估程度在5分钟时为4.7±0.28%(平均值±标准差),10分钟时为10.2±0.42%,15分钟时为15.2±0.55%。低估程度的变化很小,且不依赖于受试者的Ca(t)。因此,我们认为该结果通常适用于微球模型的各种研究。由于在临床研究中4.7%被认为可以忽略不计,我们得出结论,无论洗脱情况如何,微球模型均可用于在5分钟内获得准确的rCBF测量值。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验