Suppr超能文献

类风湿关节炎中免疫复合物三种免疫测定法的比较

Comparison of three immunoassays for immune complexes in rheumatoid arthritis.

作者信息

Gupta R C, McDuffie F C, Huston K A, Tappeiner G, Meurer M, Jordon R E, Luthra H S, Hunder G G, Ilstrup D

出版信息

Arthritis Rheum. 1979 May;22(5):433-9. doi: 10.1002/art.1780220501.

Abstract

Three widely used radioassays that depend on different principles for the measurement of circulating immune complexes (CIC) in biologic fluids are the monoclonal rheumatoid factor (mRF), Raji cell, and C1q binding tests. A comparison of the ability of these methods to measure immune complex-like material in 71 sera and 30 synovial fluids of 91 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) was carried out by a group working in adjacent laboratories in a single institution. The highest number of abnormal levels in the seropositive group was detected by the C1q binding assay (91%). Levels of CIC by the mRF and Raji cell tests were elevated in 81% and 76% of the patients, respectively. The closest correlation was between the Raji and mRF tests (r = 0.44 and P = 0.002) although one depends on complement fixation and one does not. Though significant correlations between the levels of CIC determined by the C1q test and either the mRF (P = 0.2) or Raji cell (P = 0.3) assay were not found in this group, 59% of the samples had elevated levels by all three tests. The frequency of CIC in the sera of patients with seronegative RA was much lower, with the C1q test again giving the highest number of abnormal results (29% versus 16% and 12% for the Raji and mRF tests). In view of the technical problems associated with these tests, particularly lack of a uniform reliable standard, it is likely that all three tests measure the same material in most RA sera and that some of the differences observed are related to inherent variability in the tests themselves rather than intrinsic differences among the CIC detected in these samples.

摘要

三种广泛应用的放射免疫分析方法,它们基于不同原理来检测生物体液中循环免疫复合物(CIC),分别是单克隆类风湿因子(mRF)、拉吉细胞和C1q结合试验。在同一机构相邻实验室工作的一组人员,对这三种方法检测91例类风湿关节炎(RA)患者的71份血清和30份滑液中免疫复合物样物质的能力进行了比较。在血清阳性组中,C1q结合试验检测到的异常水平数量最多(91%)。mRF和拉吉细胞试验检测出的CIC水平分别在81%和76%的患者中升高。拉吉细胞试验和mRF试验之间的相关性最为密切(r = 0.44,P = 0.002),尽管其中一个依赖补体固定,另一个则不依赖。虽然在该组中未发现C1q试验测定的CIC水平与mRF试验(P = 0.2)或拉吉细胞试验(P = 0.3)之间存在显著相关性,但59%的样本通过所有三种试验检测出水平升高。血清阴性RA患者血清中CIC的频率要低得多,C1q试验再次给出了最高数量的异常结果(拉吉细胞试验和mRF试验分别为16%和12%,与之相比为29%)。鉴于这些试验存在的技术问题,尤其是缺乏统一可靠的标准,很可能所有这三种试验在大多数RA血清中检测的是同一种物质,并且观察到的一些差异与试验本身固有的变异性有关,而非这些样本中检测到的CIC之间的内在差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验