Alexander T S, Gray L D, Kraft J A, Leland D S, Nikaido M T, Willis D H
Summa Health System, Akron, Ohio 44309, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 1996 May;34(5):1180-3. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.5.1180-1183.1996.
Serology is the principal laboratory method used to diagnose Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection. Meridian Diagnostics has developed the ImmunoCard Mycoplasma kit, a 10-min card-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) designed to detect immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies to M. pneumoniae. We compared the ImmunoCard with two M. pneumoniae IgM-specific assays (immunofluorescence assay [IFA] and ELISA) and a standard complement fixation (CF) procedure using 896 specimens submitted to clinical laboratories for M. pneumoniae serology. Equivocal results obtained by CF, IFA, or ELISA were resolved by testing with an additional method or by reviewing patient chart information. The ImmunoCard had sensitivities ranging from 74% compared with the ELISA to 96% compared with CF results with IFA. ImmunoCard specificities ranged from 85% compared with the IgM-specific ELISA to 98% compared with IgM-specific IFA results resolved with clinical chart review. We also compared the ImmunoCard results with consensus results of 694 specimens tested on at least two non-ImmunoCard methods because of the lack of a "gold standard" for M. pneumoniae serology. Overall, the ImmunoCard Mycoplasma IgM assay had 90% sensitivity, 93% specificity, and 92% agreement with the consensus results. The ImmunoCard is technically less complex and requires less equipment that the three other assays. Our results indicate that the ImmunoCard Mycoplasma IgM assay is a valid and simple procedure which can reduce technologist time (and, thus, labor cost) and turnaround time for laboratories analyzing small numbers of specimens (< 10 per batch) submitted for IgM anti-M. pneumoniae testing.
血清学是用于诊断肺炎支原体感染的主要实验室方法。子午线诊断公司开发了免疫卡支原体检测试剂盒,这是一种基于卡片的10分钟酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA),旨在检测针对肺炎支原体的免疫球蛋白M(IgM)抗体。我们将免疫卡与两种肺炎支原体IgM特异性检测方法(免疫荧光测定[IFA]和ELISA)以及一种标准补体结合(CF)程序进行了比较,使用了896份提交至临床实验室进行肺炎支原体血清学检测的标本。通过CF、IFA或ELISA获得的可疑结果通过用另一种方法检测或查阅患者病历信息来解决。免疫卡的敏感性范围为与ELISA相比为74%,与IFA的CF结果相比为96%。免疫卡的特异性范围为与IgM特异性ELISA相比为85%,与通过临床病历审查解决的IgM特异性IFA结果相比为98%。由于缺乏肺炎支原体血清学的“金标准”,我们还将免疫卡结果与694份至少用两种非免疫卡方法检测的标本的一致结果进行了比较。总体而言,免疫卡支原体IgM检测的敏感性为90%,特异性为93%,与一致结果的一致性为92%。免疫卡在技术上不如其他三种检测复杂,所需设备也更少。我们的结果表明,免疫卡支原体IgM检测是一种有效且简单的程序,可减少技术人员时间(从而降低劳动力成本)以及实验室分析少量提交进行抗肺炎支原体IgM检测的标本(每批<10份)的周转时间。