Botega N J, Bio M R, Zomignani M A, Garcia C, Pereira W A
Departamento de Psicologia Médica e Psiquiatria, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), SP, Brasil.
Rev Saude Publica. 1995 Oct;29(5):355-63. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89101995000500004.
The revised Clinical Interview Schedule (CIS-R) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) Scale were used to estimate the prevalence of mood disorders among 78 consecutive admissions to a general medical ward in a university general hospital in Brazil (43 males and 35 females; mean age = 43.2yr). Interviewers also completed a 5-point symptom severity scales for anxiety and depression. The definition of cases of anxiety [and depression] was based on two criteria: a. score > or = 2 on the CIS-R section of anxiety [> or = 4 on the CIS-R sections of depression and depressive ideas]; and b. score > or = 2 on the clinical severity scale for anxiety [score > or = 2 on the clinical severity scale for depression]. A 39% prevalence rate of affective disorders was found. Sixteen (20.5%) patients met criteria for anxiety, most of the disorders being of mild severity. Twenty-sic patients (33%) were depressed, 7 of them in a moderate degree. The HAD was easily understood by the patients. Anxiety and depression subscales had internal consistency of 0.68 and 0.77, respectively. At a cut-off point of 8/9 sensibility and specificity were 93.7% and 72.6% for anxiety, and 84.6% and 90.3% for depression. HAD items correlated positively with the respective subscales. To a lesser degree, they also correlated with the alternative subscale. Our findings confirm the high prevalence of mood disorders among medical in-patients. In clinical practice, the HAD may have a useful role in detecting those patients requiring further psychological care.
采用修订后的临床访谈量表(CIS-R)和医院焦虑抑郁量表(HAD)对巴西一所大学综合医院普通内科病房连续收治的78例患者(43例男性,35例女性;平均年龄=43.2岁)进行情绪障碍患病率评估。访谈者还完成了焦虑和抑郁的5分症状严重程度量表。焦虑[和抑郁]病例的定义基于两个标准:a. 在CIS-R焦虑部分得分≥2分[在CIS-R抑郁和抑郁观念部分得分≥4分];b. 在焦虑临床严重程度量表上得分≥2分[在抑郁临床严重程度量表上得分≥2分]。发现情感障碍的患病率为39%。16例(20.5%)患者符合焦虑标准,大多数障碍为轻度。26例(33%)患者抑郁,其中7例为中度。患者很容易理解HAD量表。焦虑和抑郁分量表的内部一致性分别为0.68和0.77。在8/9的截断点,焦虑的敏感性和特异性分别为93.7%和72.6%,抑郁的敏感性和特异性分别为84.6%和90.3%。HAD量表项目与各自的分量表呈正相关。在较小程度上,它们也与另一个分量表相关。我们的研究结果证实了内科住院患者中情绪障碍的高患病率。在临床实践中,HAD量表在检测那些需要进一步心理护理的患者方面可能具有有用的作用。