Metcalf J V, Smith J, Jones R, Record C O
Department of Medicine, University of Newcastle Upon Tyne.
Br J Gen Pract. 1996 Mar;46(404):161-4.
Rectal bleeding is common, but it is still unclear which patients require investigation to exclude serious pathology, although it is known that colectoral cancer is very rare under the age of 40 years. Few studies have examined all patients presenting to their primary health physician rather than screening whole populations.
The aim of this study was to investigate the view that all patients over the age of 40 who present to their general practitioner with rectal bleeding should undergo investigation by colonoscopy to rule out serious pathology, regardless of symptomatology.
A prospective study was carried out of 99 consecutive patients over 40 years presenting with rectal bleeding to 17 general practices in Newcastle upon Tyne.
Serious pathology was detected by colonoscopy in 44.4% of patients. The diagnoses were: colorectal carcinoma, eight cases (two Dukes' grade A, two Dukes' grade B, four Dukes' grade C); one or more polyps, 25 cases (in 17 cases at least one polyp was 5 mm or greater in diameter); inflammatory bowel disease, 11 cases. In the remaining 55 patients, bleeding was associated with diverticular disease (16 cases) and haemorrhoids (28 cases). No cause was found in 11 patients. This high rate of pathology may be partly caused by selection of cases for referral by the general practitioner, despite efforts to minimize this. Three symptoms as elicited by the colonoscopist were found to be significantly associated with serious disease: blood mixed with stool (P < 0.001); change in bowel habit (P < 0.005); and the presence of abdominal pain (P < 0.025). However, symptoms elicited on primary presentation were less helpful and symptoms changed significantly between consultation with the general practitioner and colonoscopy.
All patients over the age of 40 years presenting with rectal bleeding should be referred for flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy. Symptoms are unhelpful in deciding who requires investigation.
直肠出血很常见,但仍不清楚哪些患者需要进行检查以排除严重病变,尽管已知40岁以下患结直肠癌的情况非常罕见。很少有研究对所有就诊于初级保健医生的患者进行检查,而不是对整个人群进行筛查。
本研究的目的是调查这样一种观点,即所有40岁以上因直肠出血就诊于全科医生的患者,无论症状如何,均应接受结肠镜检查以排除严重病变。
对泰恩河畔纽卡斯尔17家全科诊所连续就诊的99例40岁以上直肠出血患者进行了一项前瞻性研究。
结肠镜检查发现44.4%的患者存在严重病变。诊断结果为:结直肠癌8例(2例杜克A期,2例杜克B期,4例杜克C期);一个或多个息肉25例(17例中至少有一个息肉直径≥5mm);炎症性肠病11例。其余55例患者的出血与憩室病(16例)和痔疮(28例)有关。11例患者未发现病因。尽管已尽力减少,但这种高病变率可能部分是由于全科医生转诊病例的选择所致。结肠镜检查医生发现有三种症状与严重疾病显著相关:便血(P<0.001);排便习惯改变(P<0.005);腹痛(P<0.025)。然而,初诊时出现的症状帮助较小,且从全科医生会诊到结肠镜检查期间症状有显著变化。
所有40岁以上出现直肠出血的患者均应转诊进行乙状结肠镜检查或结肠镜检查。症状无助于决定哪些患者需要进行检查。