• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Sodium picosulphate compared with polyethylene glycol solution for large bowel lavage: a prospective randomised trial.

作者信息

Hamilton D, Mulcahy D, Walsh D, Farrelly C, Tormey W P, Watson G

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Waterford Regional Hospital.

出版信息

Br J Clin Pract. 1996 Mar;50(2):73-5.

PMID:8731641
Abstract

Mechanical efficiency, patient acceptability and minimal biochemical perturbation are important factors in the choice of lavage solution for bowel preparation. This prospective randomised trial of 59 patients compared a polyethylene glycol bowel lavage solution (Klean Prep) to a sodium picosulphate solution (Picolax) considering their efficacy from both colonoscopists' and radiologists' points of view, patient acceptibility, and plasma biochemical changes. The sodium picosulphate solution was more acceptable to patients than the polyethylene glycol, and resulted in significantly less nausea and vomiting (p = 0.0025), and far fewer consumption difficulties (p < 0.0001). Mean plasma biochemical changes were significantly different for magnesium (p < 0.001), chloride (p < 0.01) and potassium (p < 0.02). Because neither lavage solution displayed a marked advantage for the colonoscopist or radiologist, and sodium picosulphate was more acceptable to patients, sodium picosulphate is the preferred solution for bowel preparation. The changes in plasma biochemistry values are unlikely to cause clinical problems.

摘要

相似文献

1
Sodium picosulphate compared with polyethylene glycol solution for large bowel lavage: a prospective randomised trial.
Br J Clin Pract. 1996 Mar;50(2):73-5.
2
Time for individualized colonoscopy bowel-prep regimens? A randomized controlled trial comparing sodium picosulphate and magnesium citrate versus 4-liter split-dose polyethylene glycol.个体化结肠镜肠道准备方案的时间到了吗?一项比较匹克硫酸钠和柠檬酸镁与 4 升分剂量聚乙二醇的随机对照试验。
J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2013 Jun;22(2):129-34.
3
Administration of olive oil followed by a low volume of polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution improves patient satisfaction with right-side colonic cleansing over administration of the conventional volume of polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution for colonoscopy preparation.相较于使用常规剂量的聚乙二醇电解质灌洗液进行结肠镜检查准备,先给予橄榄油再给予少量聚乙二醇电解质灌洗液可提高患者对右侧结肠清洁的满意度。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Sep;70(3):515-21. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.01.002. Epub 2009 Jun 24.
4
Comparison of two bowel preparations for colonoscopy: sodium picosulphate with magnesium citrate versus sulphate-free polyethylene glycol lavage solution.两种用于结肠镜检查的肠道准备方法的比较:匹可硫酸钠与枸橼酸镁对比无硫酸盐聚乙二醇灌洗液
Am J Gastroenterol. 1998 Sep;93(9):1478-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1998.00467.x.
5
'Pico-Bello-Klean study': effectiveness and patient tolerability of bowel preparation agents sodium picosulphate-magnesium citrate and polyethylene glycol before colonoscopy. A single-blinded randomized trial.“皮科-贝洛-克莱恩研究”:结肠镜检查前肠道准备药物比沙可啶-枸橼酸镁和聚乙二醇的有效性及患者耐受性。一项单盲随机试验
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Jan;27(1):29-38. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000192.
6
Clinical trial: sodium phosphate tablets are preferred and better tolerated by patients compared to polyethylene glycol solution plus bisacodyl tablets for bowel preparation.临床试验:与聚乙二醇溶液加比沙可啶片用于肠道准备相比,磷酸钠片更受患者青睐且耐受性更好。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Nov 15;26(10):1361-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03496.x.
7
Comparison of reduced volume versus four-liter electrolyte lavage solutions for colon cleansing.用于结肠清洗的减少容量与四升电解质灌洗溶液的比较。
Am Surg. 2006 Oct;72(10):909-11.
8
Plasma magnesium should be monitored perioperatively in patients undergoing colorectal resection.对于接受结直肠切除术的患者,应在围手术期监测血浆镁水平。
Colorectal Dis. 2009 Jul;11(6):613-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01612.x. Epub 2008 Jul 4.
9
Efficacy and acceptability of sodium picosulphate/magnesium citrate vs low-volume polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid for colon cleansing: a randomized controlled trial.聚乙二醇电解质散/枸橼酸镁钠与低渗聚乙二醇加维生素 C 用于肠道清洁的疗效和可接受性比较:一项随机对照试验。
Colorectal Dis. 2013 Sep;15(9):1145-53. doi: 10.1111/codi.12246.
10
A randomised controlled trial of a new 2 litre polyethylene glycol solution versus sodium picosulphate + magnesium citrate solution for bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy.一项关于新型2升聚乙二醇溶液与比沙可啶钠+枸橼酸镁溶液在结肠镜检查前肠道准备中的随机对照试验。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2008 Feb;24(2):481-8. doi: 10.1185/030079908x260844.

引用本文的文献

1
Cleansing efficacy and safety of bowel preparation protocol using sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate considering subjective experiences: An observational study.基于主观体验考量聚乙二醇4000联合西甲硅油肠道准备方案的清洁效果及安全性:一项观察性研究
World J Clin Cases. 2021 May 26;9(15):3586-3596. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i15.3586.
2
Predictors and colonoscopy outcomes of inadequate bowel cleansing: a 10-year experience in 28,725 patients.肠道准备不充分的预测因素及结肠镜检查结果:28725例患者的10年经验
Ann Gastroenterol. 2019 Sep-Oct;32(5):457-462. doi: 10.20524/aog.2019.0400. Epub 2019 Jul 6.
3
A prospective randomized clinical study evaluating the efficacy and compliance of oral sulfate solution and 2-L ascorbic acid plus polyethylene glycol.
一项评估口服硫酸盐溶液和 2-L 抗坏血酸加聚乙二醇疗效和顺应性的前瞻性随机临床研究。
Korean J Intern Med. 2020 Jul;35(4):873-880. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2017.275. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
4
More Is Not Always Better: A Randomized Trial Of Low Volume Oral Laxative, Enemas, And Combination Of Both Demonstrate That Enemas Alone Are Most Efficacious For Preparation For Flexible Sigmoidoscopy.多并不总是更好:一项关于小剂量口服泻药、灌肠剂以及两者联合使用的随机试验表明,单独使用灌肠剂在乙状结肠镜检查准备中最为有效。
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2016 Mar 17;7(3):e156. doi: 10.1038/ctg.2016.15.
5
Systematic review and meta-analysis: sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate vs. polyethylene glycol for colonoscopy preparation.系统评价与荟萃分析:比沙可啶钠/枸橼酸镁与聚乙二醇用于结肠镜检查肠道准备的比较
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 May;72(5):523-32. doi: 10.1007/s00228-016-2013-5. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
6
Serum magnesium concentrations in patients receiving sodium picosulfate and magnesium citrate bowel preparation: an assessment of renal function and electrocardiographic conduction.接受比沙可啶钠和枸橼酸镁肠道准备患者的血清镁浓度:肾功能和心电图传导评估
Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2015 Jul 28;8:215-24. doi: 10.2147/CEG.S79216. eCollection 2015.
7
A randomized trial to compare the efficacy and tolerability of sodium picosulfate-magnesium citrate solution vs. 4 L polyethylene glycol solution as a bowel preparation for colonoscopy.一项比较比沙可啶-枸橼酸镁溶液与4升聚乙二醇溶液作为结肠镜检查肠道准备的疗效和耐受性的随机试验。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015 Oct;30(10):1407-16. doi: 10.1007/s00384-015-2307-6. Epub 2015 Jul 16.
8
Split-dose menthol-enhanced PEG vs PEG-ascorbic acid for colonoscopy preparation.分剂量薄荷醇增强型聚乙二醇与聚乙二醇-抗坏血酸用于结肠镜检查肠道准备的比较
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Feb 14;21(6):1938-44. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i6.1938.
9
Randomized controlled trial of low-volume bowel preparation agents for colonic bowel preparation: 2-L polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid versus sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate.用于结肠肠道准备的低容量肠道准备剂的随机对照试验:含抗坏血酸的2-L聚乙二醇与含枸橼酸镁的匹可硫酸钠对比
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015 Feb;30(2):251-8. doi: 10.1007/s00384-014-2066-9. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
10
Sodium Picosulfate with Magnesium Citrate (SPMC) Plus Laxative Is a Good Alternative to Conventional Large Volume Polyethylene Glycol in Bowel Preparation: A Multicenter Randomized Single-Blinded Trial.含枸橼酸镁的比沙可啶钠(SPMC)加泻药在肠道准备中是传统大容量聚乙二醇的良好替代方案:一项多中心随机单盲试验
Gut Liver. 2015 Jul;9(4):494-501. doi: 10.5009/gnl14010.