Weeks J
Center for Outcomes and Policy Research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1996(20):23-7.
Cost-utility analysis is the most commonly used approach to incorporating quality-of-life considerations into economic analyses in health care. This type of analysis produces a ratio of the incremental cost of one intervention over another to the incremental benefit produced, measured in quality-adjusted life years. To be suitable for use in calculating quality-adjusted survival, quality of life must be measured in the form of a utility. Direct utility assessment techniques are grounded in decision analytic theory and are conceptually complex and impractical for use in the clinical trial setting. Alternatives include global rating scale items with appropriate "transformations" and health state classification indices. The first cancer trials to collect economic data and utilities from patients using these techniques are now under way. These trials will serve to answer not only biological questions, but also health policy questions about whether the additional cost of the more expensive therapy is justified by the benefit it produces in both length and quality of life.
成本效用分析是将生活质量考量纳入医疗保健经济分析时最常用的方法。这种分析得出一种干预措施相对于另一种干预措施的增量成本与所产生的增量效益之比,效益以质量调整生命年衡量。为了适用于计算质量调整生存率,生活质量必须以效用的形式来衡量。直接效用评估技术以决策分析理论为基础,在概念上较为复杂,在临床试验环境中不实用。替代方法包括经过适当“转换”的整体评定量表项目和健康状态分类指数。目前正在开展首批使用这些技术从患者那里收集经济数据和效用的癌症试验。这些试验不仅将回答生物学问题,还将回答有关更昂贵治疗的额外成本是否因其在生命长度和质量方面产生的效益而合理的卫生政策问题。