• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Predictive value of ambulatory blood pressure shortly after withdrawal of antihypertensive drugs in primary care patients.基层医疗患者停用抗高血压药物后不久动态血压的预测价值。
BMJ. 1996 Aug 17;313(7054):404-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7054.404.
2
Ambulatory versus clinic blood pressure for the assessment of anti hypertensive efficacy in clinical trials: insights from the Val-Syst Study.动态血压与诊室血压用于评估临床试验中抗高血压疗效:来自Val-Syst研究的见解
Clin Ther. 2004 Sep;26(9):1436-45. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2004.09.003.
3
[Effect of combination antihypertensive therapy on circadian blood pressure and metabolic parameters in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus].[联合降压治疗对2型糖尿病患者昼夜血压及代谢参数的影响]
Kardiologiia. 2014;54(11):20-4.
4
Two-year follow-up study to evaluate the reduction of left ventricular mass and diastolic function in mild to moderate diastolic hypertensive patients.一项为期两年的随访研究,旨在评估轻度至中度舒张期高血压患者左心室质量的减轻情况及舒张功能。
J Hypertens Suppl. 1998 Oct;16(6):S15-9.
5
Antihypertensive efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil compared with amlodipine for mild-to-moderate hypertension.奥美沙坦酯与氨氯地平治疗轻至中度高血压的降压疗效及安全性比较
J Hum Hypertens. 2003 Jun;17(6):425-32. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001577.
6
Fixed-Dose Triple Combination of Antihypertensive Drugs Improves Blood Pressure Control: From Clinical Trials to Clinical Practice.固定剂量三联抗高血压药物组合可改善血压控制:从临床试验到临床实践。
Adv Ther. 2017 Apr;34(4):975-985. doi: 10.1007/s12325-017-0511-1. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
7
Effects of amlodipine and lisinopril on left ventricular mass and diastolic function in previously untreated patients with mild to moderate diastolic hypertension.氨氯地平和赖诺普利对未经治疗的轻至中度舒张期高血压患者左心室质量和舒张功能的影响。
Blood Press. 1998 May;7(2):109-17.
8
[The antihypertensive effect of lisinopril in a single daily dosage. A study of arterial pressure with ambulatory monitoring].
Arch Inst Cardiol Mex. 1995 Sep-Oct;65(5):435-43.
9
Low-grade inflammation and ambulatory blood pressure response to antihypertensive treatment: the ALPHABET study.低水平炎症与降压治疗的动态血压反应:ALPHABET 研究。
Am J Hypertens. 2013 Jun;26(6):784-92. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpt024. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
10
[Correction of endothelial dysfunction in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus during combined antihypertensive therapy].[联合降压治疗对2型糖尿病高血压患者内皮功能障碍的纠正作用]
Ter Arkh. 2014;86(8):90-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Withdrawal of antihypertensive therapy in people with dementia: feasibility study.痴呆症患者停用抗高血压治疗:可行性研究
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018 Jan 9;4:29. doi: 10.1186/s40814-017-0221-0. eCollection 2018.
2
Withdrawal of antihypertensive medication: a systematic review.停用抗高血压药物:一项系统评价。
J Hypertens. 2017 Sep;35(9):1742-1749. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001405.
3
Effect of ethnicity and hypertension on atrial conduction: evaluation with high-resolution P-wave signal averaging.种族和高血压对心房传导的影响:高分辨率P波信号平均法评估
Clin Cardiol. 2001 Sep;24(9):597-602. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960240906.
4
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring for hypertension in general practice.全科医疗中用于高血压的动态血压监测
J R Soc Med. 1998 Jun;91(6):301-4. doi: 10.1177/014107689809100604.
5
Ambulatory monitoring of blood pressure should be restricted to scientific research.动态血压监测应仅限于科学研究。
BMJ. 1996 Nov 23;313(7068):1334. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7068.1334a.

本文引用的文献

1
Short report: ambulatory blood pressure in normotensive compared with hypertensive subjects. The Ad-Hoc Working Group.简短报告:血压正常者与高血压患者的动态血压。特设工作组。
J Hypertens. 1993 Nov;11(11):1289-97.
2
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and blood pressure self-measurement in the diagnosis and management of hypertension.动态血压监测及血压自我测量在高血压诊断与管理中的应用
Ann Intern Med. 1993 Jun 1;118(11):867-82. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-118-11-199306010-00008.
3
ROC methodology in radiologic imaging.放射成像中的ROC方法学。
Invest Radiol. 1986 Sep;21(9):720-33. doi: 10.1097/00004424-198609000-00009.
4
The effect of withdrawing antihypertensive therapy: a review.
J Hypertens. 1988 Jun;6(6):431-6. doi: 10.1097/00004872-198806000-00001.
5
Reference values for ambulatory blood pressure: a meta-analysis.动态血压的参考值:一项荟萃分析。
J Hypertens Suppl. 1990 Dec;8(6):S57-64.
6
When is discontinuation of antihypertensive therapy indicated?
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1990 Dec;4(6):1487-94. doi: 10.1007/BF02026496.
7
Cumulative sums in quantifying circadian blood pressure patterns.
Hypertension. 1992 Jan;19(1):93-101. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.19.1.93.

基层医疗患者停用抗高血压药物后不久动态血压的预测价值。

Predictive value of ambulatory blood pressure shortly after withdrawal of antihypertensive drugs in primary care patients.

作者信息

Beltman F W, Heesen W F, Kok R H, Smit A J, May J F, de Graeff P A, Havinga T K, Schuurman F H, van der Veur E, Lie K I, Meyboom-de Jong B

机构信息

Department of General Practice, University of Groningen, Netherlands.

出版信息

BMJ. 1996 Aug 17;313(7054):404-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7054.404.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.313.7054.404
PMID:8761232
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2351811/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether ambulatory blood pressure eight weeks after withdrawal of antihypertensive medication is a more sensitive measure than seated blood pressure to predict blood pressure in the long term.

DESIGN

Patients with previously untreated diastolic hypertension were treated with antihypertensive drugs for one year; these were withdrawn in patients with well controlled blood pressure, who were then followed for one year.

SETTING

Primary care.

SUBJECTS

29 patients fulfilling the criteria for withdrawal of antihypertensive drugs.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value of seated and ambulatory blood pressure eight weeks after withdrawal of antihypertensive drugs.

RESULTS

Eight weeks after withdrawal of medication, mean diastolic blood pressure returned to the pretreatment level on ambulatory measurements but not on seated measurements. One year after withdrawal of medication, mean diastolic blood pressure had returned to the pretreatment level both for seated and ambulatory blood pressure. For ambulatory blood pressure, the sensitivity and the positive predictive value eight weeks after withdrawal of medication were superior to those for seated blood pressure; specificity and negative predictive value were comparable for both types of measurement. Receiver operating characteristic curves showed that the results were not dependent on the cut off values that were used.

CONCLUSION

Ambulatory blood pressure eight weeks after withdrawal of antihypertensive drugs predicts long term blood pressure better than measurements made when the patient is seated.

摘要

目的

确定停用抗高血压药物8周后的动态血压是否比坐位血压更能敏感地预测长期血压。

设计

对既往未经治疗的舒张期高血压患者使用抗高血压药物治疗一年;血压控制良好的患者停用药物,然后随访一年。

地点

初级保健机构。

研究对象

29例符合停用抗高血压药物标准的患者。

主要观察指标

停用抗高血压药物8周后坐位和动态血压的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。

结果

停药8周后,动态血压测量时平均舒张压恢复到治疗前水平,而坐位测量时未恢复。停药一年后,坐位和动态血压的平均舒张压均恢复到治疗前水平。对于动态血压,停药8周后的敏感性和阳性预测值优于坐位血压;两种测量方式的特异性和阴性预测值相当。受试者工作特征曲线显示结果不依赖于所使用的临界值。

结论

停用抗高血压药物8周后的动态血压比患者坐位测量时更能准确预测长期血压。