Bösenberg A T, Williams G D, Reddy D
Department of Anaesthetics, University of Natal, Durban.
S Afr Med J. 1996 Jun;86(6):664-7.
To determine the attitudes of South African anaesthetists with regard to allowing parents to be present during the induction of anaesthesia in children, and to determine the source and extent of resistance to this controversial practice.
Questionnaire survey consisting of three parts and based on a previous study.
Southern Africa.
All practising anaesthetists, specialist and non-specialist, on the mailing list of a major pharmaceutical company.
Responses were obtained from 222 anaesthetists from 80 different localities in southern Africa. The majority of the respondents were specialist anaesthetists in private practice with between 5 and 15 years' experience. Of the respondents 55% agreed that it was acceptable to allow parents to be present at induction and that this did not compromise the child's safety; 117 claimed that there was resistance to the practice, perceiving the matron and nursing staff as the major source of resistance, both currently and in the past. Lack of facilities and loss of operating theatre sterility were cited as the main reasons for resistance.
Although the practice is still controversial, the majority of anaesthetists who responded to the survey would be happy to allow parents to accompany children at induction. It should be catered for and encouraged according to certain guidelines.
确定南非麻醉医师对于允许家长在儿童麻醉诱导期间在场的态度,并确定对这种有争议做法的抵制来源及程度。
基于先前研究,由三部分组成的问卷调查。
南部非洲。
一家大型制药公司邮件列表中的所有执业麻醉医师,包括专科和非专科医师。
从南部非洲80个不同地区的222名麻醉医师处获得了回复。大多数受访者是有5至15年经验的私人执业专科麻醉医师。55%的受访者同意允许家长在诱导时在场是可以接受的,且这不会损害儿童安全;117人声称存在对该做法的抵制,认为护士长和护理人员是当前及过去抵制的主要来源。缺乏设施和手术室无菌性丧失被列为抵制的主要原因。
尽管这种做法仍存在争议,但参与调查的大多数麻醉医师愿意让家长在诱导时陪伴儿童。应根据某些指导方针加以考虑并鼓励。