• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

蔬菜、水果与结直肠癌风险:一项来自乌拉圭的病例对照研究

Vegetables, fruits, and risk of colorectal cancer: a case-control study from Uruguay.

作者信息

Deneo-Pellegrini H, De Stefani E, Ronco A

机构信息

Registro Nacional de Cancer, Instituto Nacional de Oncologia, Montevideo, Uruguay.

出版信息

Nutr Cancer. 1996;25(3):297-304. doi: 10.1080/01635589609514453.

DOI:10.1080/01635589609514453
PMID:8771572
Abstract

To examine whether vegetable and fruit intake modify colorectal cancer risk, a case-control study was conducted in Uruguay. Dietary patterns were assessed in detail (for cases before diagnosis or symptoms occurred) by use of a food frequency questionnaire on 61 food items, which allowed the calculation of total energy intake. Nutrient residuals were calculated through regression analysis. After adjustment for potential confounders (which included body mass index, total energy, and total alcohol intake), a reduction in risk for total vegetable intake, total fruit intake, and lettuce, apple, and banana consumption was observed. The strongest protection was observed for banana intake (odds ratio 0.28; 95% confidence level 0.16-0.50) for consumption in the third tertile compared with the first.

摘要

为了研究蔬菜和水果摄入量是否会改变结直肠癌风险,在乌拉圭开展了一项病例对照研究。通过一份包含61种食物的食物频率问卷(在病例出现诊断或症状之前)详细评估饮食模式,该问卷可用于计算总能量摄入量。通过回归分析计算营养素残差。在对潜在混杂因素(包括体重指数、总能量和总酒精摄入量)进行调整后,观察到总蔬菜摄入量、总水果摄入量以及生菜、苹果和香蕉摄入量的风险降低。与第一三分位数相比,第三三分位数的香蕉摄入量观察到最强的保护作用(优势比0.28;95%置信区间0.16 - 0.50)。

相似文献

1
Vegetables, fruits, and risk of colorectal cancer: a case-control study from Uruguay.蔬菜、水果与结直肠癌风险:一项来自乌拉圭的病例对照研究
Nutr Cancer. 1996;25(3):297-304. doi: 10.1080/01635589609514453.
2
Fruit and vegetable consumption and the risk of proximal colon, distal colon, and rectal cancers in a case-control study in Western Australia.西澳大利亚一项病例对照研究中的水果和蔬菜摄入量与近端结肠癌、远端结肠癌及直肠癌风险
J Am Diet Assoc. 2011 Oct;111(10):1479-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2011.07.008.
3
Vegetables, fruits, and related nutrients and risk of breast cancer: a case-control study in Uruguay.蔬菜、水果及相关营养素与乳腺癌风险:乌拉圭的一项病例对照研究
Nutr Cancer. 1999;35(2):111-9. doi: 10.1207/S15327914NC352_3.
4
Intake of fruits, vegetables, and soy foods in relation to breast cancer risk in Korean women: a case-control study.韩国女性摄入水果、蔬菜和大豆类食物与乳腺癌风险的关系:一项病例对照研究。
Nutr Cancer. 2007;57(1):20-7. doi: 10.1080/01635580701268063.
5
Dietary fiber and risk of breast cancer: a case-control study in Uruguay.膳食纤维与乳腺癌风险:乌拉圭的一项病例对照研究
Nutr Cancer. 1997;28(1):14-9. doi: 10.1080/01635589709514547.
6
Tea consumption and risk of cancer of the colon and rectum.饮茶与结直肠癌风险
Nutr Cancer. 2001;41(1-2):33-40. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2001.9680609.
7
Plant sterols and risk of stomach cancer: a case-control study in Uruguay.植物甾醇与胃癌风险:乌拉圭的一项病例对照研究
Nutr Cancer. 2000;37(2):140-4. doi: 10.1207/S15327914NC372_4.
8
Case-control study on beneficial effect of regular consumption of apples on colorectal cancer risk in a population with relatively low intake of fruits and vegetables.以人群中相对较低的水果和蔬菜摄入量为基础,关于经常食用苹果对结直肠癌风险的有益影响的病例对照研究。
Eur J Cancer Prev. 2010 Jan;19(1):42-7. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0b013e328333d0cc.
9
Role of different types of vegetables and fruit in the prevention of cancer of the colon, rectum, and breast.不同种类蔬菜和水果在预防结肠癌、直肠癌和乳腺癌中的作用。
Epidemiology. 1998 May;9(3):338-41.
10
Dietary intake of vegetables and fruits and the modification effects of GSTM1 and NAT2 genotypes on bladder cancer risk.蔬菜和水果的膳食摄入量以及GSTM1和NAT2基因多态性对膀胱癌风险的修饰作用。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009 Jul;18(7):2090-7. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-1174. Epub 2009 Jun 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the Reproducibility and Verifiability of Nutrition Research: A Case Study of Studies Assessing the Relationship Between Potatoes and Colorectal Cancer.评估营养研究的可重复性和可验证性:以评估土豆与结直肠癌关系的研究为例
medRxiv. 2024 Dec 2:2024.12.01.24318272. doi: 10.1101/2024.12.01.24318272.
2
The association between fruit and vegetable intake and gastrointestinal cancers risk from Mendelian randomization analysis.基于孟德尔随机化分析的水果和蔬菜摄入与胃肠道癌风险之间的关联。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 21;14(1):28860. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-79650-2.
3
Different types of fruit intake and colorectal cancer risk: A meta-analysis of observational studies.
不同类型的水果摄入与结直肠癌风险:观察性研究的荟萃分析。
World J Gastroenterol. 2023 May 7;29(17):2679-2700. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i17.2679.
4
A Novel Banana Mutant "" ( spp. ABB, Pisang Awak Subgroup) for Improved Agronomic Traits and Enhanced Cold Tolerance and Disease Resistance.一种具有改良农艺性状、增强耐寒性和抗病性的新型香蕉突变体“”(芭蕉属ABB组,阿哇蕉亚组)
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Sep 23;12:730718. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.730718. eCollection 2021.
5
Colorectal cancer screening in Uruguay: current assessment and roadmap for the future.乌拉圭的结直肠癌筛查:当前评估与未来路线图。
Psicol Reflex Crit. 2021 Jun 29;34(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s41155-021-00178-9.
6
Potato Consumption and Risk of Site-Specific Cancers in Adults: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.马铃薯摄入量与成人特定部位癌症风险的系统评价和剂量反应荟萃分析:观察性研究。
Adv Nutr. 2021 Oct 1;12(5):1705-1722. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmab024.
7
Apple intake and cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.苹果摄入与癌症风险:观察性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
Public Health Nutr. 2016 Oct;19(14):2603-17. doi: 10.1017/S136898001600032X. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
8
Highly efficient Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of banana cv. Rasthali (AAB) via sonication and vacuum infiltration.通过超声处理和真空渗透法实现香蕉 cv. Rasthali(AAB)的高效农杆菌介导转化。
Plant Cell Rep. 2011 Mar;30(3):425-36. doi: 10.1007/s00299-010-0996-4. Epub 2011 Jan 7.
9
A ferulic acid derivative, ethyl 3-(4'-geranyloxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-2-propenoate, as a new candidate chemopreventive agent for colon carcinogenesis in the rat.一种阿魏酸衍生物,3-(4'-香叶氧基-3-甲氧基苯基)-2-丙烯酸乙酯,作为大鼠结肠癌发生的新型化学预防剂候选物。
Jpn J Cancer Res. 2001 Apr;92(4):404-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2001.tb01109.x.