Schoeny R
National Center for Environmental Assessment-Cincinnati, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Ohio 45268, USA.
Environ Health Perspect. 1996 May;104 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):663-73. doi: 10.1289/ehp.96104s3663.
Assessment of human health risks of environmental agents has often been limited to consideration of the potential for the agent to cause cancer or general systemic toxicity after long-term exposure. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) is increasingly moving toward the development of integrated assessments, which consider all potential health end points including developmental toxicity, neurotoxicity, immunotoxicity, reproductive effects, and germ cell mutagenicity. The U.S. EPA has a responsibility to assess risks to nonhuman species or ecosystems when appropriate data are available. An example of a recent integrated human health and ecological risk assessment can be found in the U.S. EPA Mercury Study Report to Congress. This report covers the following topics in separate volumes: an inventory of anthropogenic mercury emissions in the United States; an exposure assessment using measured and predicted values and including indirect dietary exposure; an evaluation of human health risks; an assessment of ecologic risk wherein water criteria are presented for several wildlife species; an overall integrated characterization of human and nonhuman risk; and a discussion of risk management considerations. In the evaluation of human health risk, genetic toxicology data were considered for three forms of mercury: elemental, inorganic (divalent), and methylmercury. These data were used in judgments of two types of potential health effects (carcinogenicity and germ cell mutagenicity). In assessment of potential carcinogenicity of inorganic and methylmercury, genetic toxicity data were key. Data for clastogenicity in the absence of mutagenicity supported the characterization of inorganic and methylmercury as materials that produce carcinogenic effects only at high, toxic doses. The evidence for clastogenicity, coupled with information on metabolism and distribution, resulted in a judgment of a moderate degree of concern (or weight of evidence) that inorganic mercury can act as a human germ cell mutagen. For methylmercury, the degree of concern for germ cell mutagenicity is high.
对环境介质的人体健康风险评估通常局限于考虑该介质在长期暴露后导致癌症或一般全身毒性的可能性。美国环境保护局(U.S. EPA)正日益转向开展综合评估,这种评估会考虑所有潜在的健康终点,包括发育毒性、神经毒性、免疫毒性、生殖影响以及生殖细胞致突变性。当有适当数据时,美国环境保护局有责任评估对非人类物种或生态系统的风险。美国环境保护局提交给国会的《汞研究报告》就是近期人体健康与生态风险综合评估的一个例子。这份报告在不同卷册中涵盖了以下主题:美国人为汞排放清单;使用实测值和预测值进行的暴露评估,包括间接膳食暴露;人体健康风险评估;生态风险评估,其中给出了几种野生动物物种的水质标准;人类和非人类风险的总体综合特征描述;以及风险管理考量的讨论。在人体健康风险评估中,针对三种汞形态(元素汞、无机汞(二价汞)和甲基汞)考虑了遗传毒理学数据。这些数据被用于判断两种潜在的健康影响(致癌性和生殖细胞致突变性)。在评估无机汞和甲基汞的潜在致癌性时,遗传毒性数据是关键。在无致突变性情况下的断裂剂数据支持将无机汞和甲基汞表征为仅在高毒性剂量下才产生致癌作用的物质。断裂剂证据,再加上有关代谢和分布的信息,得出了一个关于无机汞可作为人类生殖细胞致突变剂的中度关注程度(或证据权重)的判断。对于甲基汞,对生殖细胞致突变性的关注程度很高。