van Doorn L J, Kleter B, Pike I, Quint W
Diagnostic Center SSDZ, Department of Molecular Biology, GA Delft, The Netherlands.
J Clin Microbiol. 1996 Jul;34(7):1784-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.34.7.1784-1787.1996.
Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive sera from 106 chronically infected patients which had previously been genotyped were characterized by serotyping. Genotypes were determined by a first-generation line probe assay (INNO-LiPA HCV) and by sequence analyses of the core, core-E1, and NS5B regions. HCV serotypes were determined by measuring type-specific antibodies to NS4-derived peptide antigens (Murex HCV serotyping 1-6 assay). Of 106 serum samples, serotype-specific antibodies were detected in 88 (sensitivity, 83.0%), and 77 (specificity, 87.5%) of these serotypeable samples revealed a corresponding serotype (total concordance, 72.6%). Eleven samples revealed discrepant results as follows. (i) Five serum samples in which only a single genotype was detected contained an additional serotype. (ii) In one sample with two genotypes only one serotype was detected. (iii) In five isolates the serotype (all serotype 1) was completely different from the genotype. Double infections, as determined by genotyping, were confirmed by serotyping in two of four cases. Of 11 serum samples from chronically infected hemodialysis patients, 7 (64%) were reactive in the serotyping assay. In conclusion, genotyping allows discrimination between (sub)types but requires the relatively complex reverse transcriptase PCR. The novel serotyping assay offers an alternative method to distinguish the major types of HCV, although the sensitivity of the assay may be limited by the immunocompetence of the infected host.
对106例先前已进行基因分型的慢性丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染患者的血清进行血清学分型。通过第一代线性探针分析(INNO-LiPA HCV)以及核心区、核心-E1区和NS5B区的序列分析来确定基因型。通过检测针对NS4衍生肽抗原的型特异性抗体(Murex HCV血清学分型1-6检测法)来确定HCV血清型。在106份血清样本中,88份(敏感性为83.0%)检测到了血清型特异性抗体,在这些可进行血清学分型的样本中,77份(特异性为87.5%)显示出相应的血清型(总一致性为72.6%)。11份样本显示出如下不一致的结果。(i)5份仅检测到单一基因型的血清样本中含有另外一种血清型。(ii)在一份含有两种基因型的样本中仅检测到一种血清型。(iii)在5株分离株中,血清型(均为血清型1)与基因型完全不同。通过基因分型确定的双重感染,在4例中有2例通过血清学分型得到了证实。在11份慢性感染血液透析患者的血清样本中,7份(64%)在血清学分型检测中呈阳性反应。总之,基因分型能够区分(亚)型,但需要相对复杂的逆转录酶PCR。尽管该检测方法的敏感性可能受感染宿主免疫能力的限制,但这种新型血清学分型检测法提供了一种区分HCV主要类型的替代方法。