Sliney D H
Laser Microwave Division, US Army Environmental Hygiene Agency, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21010-5422 USA.
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 1994 Jun;1(2):107-19. doi: 10.3109/09286589409052366.
Despite the large body of laboratory evidence that ultraviolet radiation (UVR) is cataractogenic, epidemiological studies of the relationship between age-related cataract and chronic UVR exposure have provided apparently conflicting results. An explanation for these conflicting results could be related to errors in dosimetry. Failure to account for the biophysical, physiological and behavioral factors, as well as ground reflectance, which determine the level of UVR exposure of the lens can lead to completely wrong assignments of lifetime exposure. It is argued that by overlooking these factors, past epidemiological studies of UVR and cataract could readily be expected to produce conflicting results.
尽管有大量实验室证据表明紫外线辐射(UVR)可致白内障,但关于年龄相关性白内障与慢性UVR暴露之间关系的流行病学研究结果却明显相互矛盾。这些相互矛盾的结果的一个解释可能与剂量测定误差有关。未能考虑到决定晶状体UVR暴露水平的生物物理、生理和行为因素以及地面反射率,可能会导致对终生暴露的完全错误的赋值。有人认为,由于忽视了这些因素,过去关于UVR与白内障的流行病学研究很容易得出相互矛盾的结果。