Suppr超能文献

使用合金化金标准校正暴露错误分类。

Correcting for exposure misclassification using an alloyed gold standard.

作者信息

Brenner H

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, University of Ulm, Germany.

出版信息

Epidemiology. 1996 Jul;7(4):406-10. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199607000-00011.

Abstract

Validation studies are increasingly employed to estimate and correct for exposure misclassification in epidemiologic studies. Often, however, the reference procedure used for validation is less than perfect. This phenomenon may lead to biased estimates of misclassification rates and hence of "corrected" measures of associations. In particular, it has been demonstrated that basic matrix correction procedures to correct for presumably nondifferential exposure misclassification may yield strongly misleading results in the case of an imperfect gold standard. The problem arises because apparent misclassification (misclassification with respect to an alloyed gold standard) is often differential even if true misclassification (misclassification with respect to true exposure status) is nondifferential. Therefore, correction procedures for differential rather than nondifferential misclassification should be employed in the presence of an alloyed gold standard.

摘要

验证研究越来越多地用于估计和校正流行病学研究中的暴露错误分类。然而,用于验证的参考程序往往并不完美。这种现象可能导致对错误分类率以及关联“校正”测量值的估计产生偏差。特别是,已经证明,在金标准不完善的情况下,用于校正假定的非差异性暴露错误分类的基本矩阵校正程序可能会产生极具误导性的结果。出现这个问题是因为即使真正的错误分类(相对于真实暴露状态的错误分类)是非差异性的,但明显的错误分类(相对于混合金标准的错误分类)往往是差异性的。因此,在存在混合金标准的情况下,应采用针对差异性而非非差异性错误分类的校正程序。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验