• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

病例组合调整对急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)预测死亡率的影响。

The effect of casemix adjustment on mortality as predicted by APACHE II.

作者信息

Goldhill D R, Withington P S

机构信息

Anaesthetics Unit, Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel, UK.

出版信息

Intensive Care Med. 1996 May;22(5):415-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01712157.

DOI:10.1007/BF01712157
PMID:8796392
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe the effect of casemix on mortality as predicted by APACHE II scoring.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of an ICU database.

PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS

All patients admitted to 19 ICU between 1 January 1992 and 31 May 1994 on whom data had been entered into a database. Excluded from the analysis were those readmitted to ICU, those aged under 16 years, those admitted after cardiac surgery or with burns, those for whom physiological data was incomplete and those for whom hospital outcome was unknown. Data on the remaining 6258 patients are reported.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

APACHE II scores were calculated from the worst values within 24 h of ICU admission. Hospital mortality was predicted with the published equation and coefficients. Mortality ratios (observed hospital deaths divided by predicted hospital deaths) were calculated for various groups. Mortality ratios varied widely by subgroup, and observed hospital deaths were greater than predicted, particularly for the following patient groups: those with predicted mortality of less than 70%, those with APACHE II scores in the range of 5-19, those older than 55 years, those with a Glasgow Coma Score of 15 or in the range 9-14, those not having emergency surgery, those with either 0 or 4 chronic health points and those in non-operative respiratory or neurological categories. The mortality ratio was markedly less than 1.0 only among non-operative cardiovascular patients.

CONCLUSIONS

APACHE II did not accurately adjust for casemix in our data. Unless account is taken of differences in casemix, using mortality ratios to compare ICU is likely to be inaccurate and misleading.

摘要

目的

描述病例组合对急性生理学及慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE II)预测死亡率的影响。

设计

对重症监护病房(ICU)数据库进行回顾性分析。

患者及参与者

1992年1月1日至1994年5月31日期间入住19个ICU且数据已录入数据库的所有患者。分析排除了再次入住ICU的患者、16岁以下患者、心脏手术后或烧伤后入院的患者、生理数据不完整的患者以及医院结局未知的患者。报告了其余6258例患者的数据。

测量与结果

根据ICU入院后24小时内的最差值计算APACHE II评分。使用已发表的公式和系数预测医院死亡率。计算了不同组别的死亡率比值(观察到的医院死亡数除以预测的医院死亡数)。死亡率比值在各亚组中差异很大,观察到的医院死亡数大于预测值,特别是对于以下患者组:预测死亡率低于70%的患者、APACHE II评分在5 - 19范围内的患者、55岁以上的患者、格拉斯哥昏迷评分为15或在9 - 14范围内的患者、未进行急诊手术的患者、慢性健康点数为0或4的患者以及非手术性呼吸或神经科类别的患者。仅在非手术性心血管患者中,死亡率比值明显小于1.0。

结论

在我们的数据中,APACHE II未能准确调整病例组合。除非考虑病例组合的差异,使用死亡率比值比较ICU可能不准确且具有误导性。

相似文献

1
The effect of casemix adjustment on mortality as predicted by APACHE II.病例组合调整对急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)预测死亡率的影响。
Intensive Care Med. 1996 May;22(5):415-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01712157.
2
Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE II) and Glasgow coma scores as predictors of outcome from intensive care after cardiac arrest.急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估(APACHE II)及格拉斯哥昏迷评分作为心脏骤停后重症监护结局的预测指标。
Crit Care Med. 1991 Dec;19(12):1465-73. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199112000-00005.
3
Verification of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation scoring system in a Hong Kong intensive care unit.香港一间重症监护病房中急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估评分系统的验证
Crit Care Med. 1993 May;21(5):698-705. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199305000-00013.
4
Outcome of intensive care patients in a group of British intensive care units.一组英国重症监护病房中重症监护患者的治疗结果。
Crit Care Med. 1998 Aug;26(8):1337-45. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199808000-00017.
5
Performance evaluation of APACHE II score for an Indian patient with respiratory problems.用于评估印度呼吸疾病患者的急性生理学及慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE II)的性能评价
Indian J Med Res. 2004 Jun;119(6):273-82.
6
Comparison of the APACHE III, APACHE II and Glasgow Coma Scale in acute head injury for prediction of mortality and functional outcome.急性颅脑损伤中APACHE III、APACHE II和格拉斯哥昏迷量表对死亡率及功能转归预测的比较
Intensive Care Med. 1997 Jan;23(1):77-84. doi: 10.1007/s001340050294.
7
A comparison of admission and worst 24-hour Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores in predicting hospital mortality: a retrospective cohort study.入院时与最严重24小时急性生理与慢性健康状况评估II评分在预测医院死亡率方面的比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
Crit Care. 2006 Feb;10(1):R4. doi: 10.1186/cc3913.
8
Evaluation of acute physiology and chronic health evaluation III predictions of hospital mortality in an independent database.在一个独立数据库中对急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估III预测医院死亡率的评估。
Crit Care Med. 1998 Aug;26(8):1317-26. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199808000-00012.
9
Prognostic usefulness of scoring systems in critically ill patients with severe acute pancreatitis.评分系统对重症急性胰腺炎危重症患者的预后评估价值
Crit Care Med. 1999 May;27(5):901-7. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199905000-00023.
10
Intensive care unit morbidity and mortality from eclampsia: an evaluation of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score and the Glasgow Coma Scale score.子痫所致重症监护病房的发病率和死亡率:急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II及格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分的评估
Crit Care Med. 2000 Jan;28(1):120-4. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200001000-00020.

引用本文的文献

1
Mortality of adult intensive care units in Turkey using the APACHE II and SOFA systems (outcome assessment in Turkish intensive care units).使用急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)和序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)系统对土耳其成人重症监护病房的死亡率(土耳其重症监护病房的结果评估)
Arch Med Sci. 2018 Apr;14(3):510-515. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2016.59709. Epub 2016 May 5.
2
Mortality prediction in status epilepticus with the APACHE II score.使用急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE II)对癫痫持续状态患者进行死亡率预测。
J Intensive Care Soc. 2017 Nov;18(4):310-317. doi: 10.1177/1751143717715967. Epub 2017 Jun 26.
3
The use of non-invasive ventilation during acute respiratory failure due to pneumonia.

本文引用的文献

1
Intensive Care Society's APACHE II study in Britain and Ireland--II: Outcome comparisons of intensive care units after adjustment for case mix by the American APACHE II method.重症监护学会在英国和爱尔兰开展的急性生理学及慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE II)研究——II:采用美国APACHE II方法对病例组合进行调整后各重症监护病房的结局比较
BMJ. 1993 Oct 16;307(6910):977-81. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6910.977.
2
An evaluation of outcome from intensive care in major medical centers.大型医疗中心重症监护结果评估。
Ann Intern Med. 1986 Mar;104(3):410-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-104-3-410.
3
APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system.
肺炎所致急性呼吸衰竭时的无创通气应用。
Eur J Intern Med. 2012 Jul;23(5):420-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2012.02.011. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
4
Non-invasive ventilation in community-acquired pneumonia and severe acute respiratory failure.社区获得性肺炎和严重急性呼吸衰竭中的无创通气。
Intensive Care Med. 2012 Mar;38(3):458-66. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2475-6. Epub 2012 Feb 9.
5
Risk of death and the efficacy of eritoran tetrasodium (E5564): design considerations for clinical trials of anti-inflammatory agents in sepsis.死亡风险与依替多酸四钠(E5564)的疗效:脓毒症抗炎药物临床试验的设计考量
Crit Care Med. 2010 Jan;38(1):306-8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181b77fe3.
6
Clinical review: mass casualty triage--pandemic influenza and critical care.临床综述:大规模伤亡分诊——大流行性流感与重症监护
Crit Care. 2007;11(2):212. doi: 10.1186/cc5732.
7
Predictive value of thyroid hormones on the first day in adult respiratory distress syndrome patients admitted to ICU: comparison with SOFA and APACHE II scores.甲状腺激素对入住重症监护病房的成人呼吸窘迫综合征患者首日的预测价值:与序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)及急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统Ⅱ(APACHE II)评分的比较
Ann Saudi Med. 2005 Nov-Dec;25(6):466-72. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2005.466.
8
Use of the sequential organ failure assessment score as a severity score.使用序贯器官衰竭评估评分作为严重程度评分。
Intensive Care Med. 2005 Feb;31(2):243-9. doi: 10.1007/s00134-004-2528-6. Epub 2005 Jan 25.
9
Effect of the critical care outreach team on patient survival to discharge from hospital and readmission to critical care: non-randomised population based study.重症监护外展团队对患者出院生存率及再次入住重症监护病房的影响:基于人群的非随机研究
BMJ. 2003 Nov 1;327(7422):1014. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7422.1014.
10
External validation of the SAPS II, APACHE II and APACHE III prognostic models in South England: a multicentre study.英国南部SAPS II、APACHE II和APACHE III预后模型的外部验证:一项多中心研究。
Intensive Care Med. 2003 Feb;29(2):249-56. doi: 10.1007/s00134-002-1607-9. Epub 2003 Jan 18.
急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II:一种疾病严重程度分类系统。
Crit Care Med. 1985 Oct;13(10):818-29.