• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Patient decision-making: medical ethics and mediation.患者决策:医学伦理与调解
J Med Ethics. 1996 Jun;22(3):164-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.22.3.164.
2
Suffering as a consideration in ethical decision making.痛苦作为伦理决策中的一个考量因素。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1992 Spring;1(2):135-42; discussion 143-6. doi: 10.1017/s0963180100000232.
3
Current ethical issues in aging: introduction.老龄化领域当前的伦理问题:引言
Generations. 1994 Winter;18(4):5-8.
4
Medical ethics committees: a physician's perspective.医学伦理委员会:医生的视角
Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can. 1988 May;21(3):231-4.
5
Evaluating outcomes in ethics consultation research.评估伦理咨询研究中的结果。
J Clin Ethics. 1996 Summer;7(2):127-38.
6
Ethics committees in Israel.
HEC Forum. 1996 Oct;8(5):316-22. doi: 10.1007/BF00208648.
7
The theologian.神学家。
Hippocrates (Sausalito). 1988 May-Jun;2(3):84-91.
8
Praying for miracles: practical responses to requests for medically futile treatments in the ICU setting.祈求奇迹:对重症监护病房中徒劳医疗救治请求的实际应对措施
HEC Forum. 1995 Jul;7(4):228-42. doi: 10.1007/BF01463335.
9
Healthcare ethics committees: re-examining their social and moral functions.医疗伦理委员会:重新审视其社会和道德功能。
HEC Forum. 1999 Jun;11(2):87-100. doi: 10.1023/a:1008924324241.
10
A revolution in understanding: how ethics has transformed health care decision making.
QRB Qual Rev Bull. 1992 Jan;18(1):6-11. doi: 10.1016/s0097-5990(16)30497-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Ethics committees identify four key factors for success.伦理委员会确定了成功的四个关键因素。
HEC Forum. 1998 Mar;10(1):75-85. doi: 10.1023/a:1008866903466.

本文引用的文献

1
Whose will is it, anyway? A discussion of advance directives, personal identity, and consensus in medical ethics.到底是谁的意愿?关于预立医疗指示、个人身份认同与医学伦理共识的探讨
Bioethics. 1994 Jan;8(1):27-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.1994.tb00240.x.
2
Doing what the patient orders: maintaining integrity in the doctor-patient relationship.听从患者的指令:维护医患关系中的诚信。
Bioethics. 1993 Jul;7(4):290-314. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.1993.tb00220.x.
3
Enhancing patient well-being: advocacy or negotiation?提升患者福祉:支持还是协商?
J Med Ethics. 1994 Sep;20(3):152-6. doi: 10.1136/jme.20.3.152.
4
The Oxford Practice Skills Project: teaching ethics, law and communication skills to clinical medical students.牛津实践技能项目:向临床医学专业学生传授伦理、法律和沟通技巧。
J Med Ethics. 1994 Dec;20(4):229-34. doi: 10.1136/jme.20.4.229.
5
Twenty years of the JME--reflections. Journal of Medical Ethics.青少年肌阵挛性癫痫二十年——反思。《医学伦理学杂志》
J Med Ethics. 1995 Feb;21(1):3-4. doi: 10.1136/jme.21.1.3.
6
Metaphysics and medical ethics.形而上学与医学伦理学。
J Med Ethics. 1995 Apr;21(2):106-11. doi: 10.1136/jme.21.2.106.
7
Facilitating medical ethics case review: what ethics committees can learn from mediation and facilitation techniques.促进医学伦理案例审查:伦理委员会可从调解和促进技巧中学到什么。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1992 Winter;1(1):63-74. doi: 10.1017/s0963180100000098.
8
The medicalization of life.生活的医学化
J Med Ethics. 1975 Jul;1(2):73-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.1.2.73.

患者决策:医学伦理与调解

Patient decision-making: medical ethics and mediation.

作者信息

Craig Y J

机构信息

London School of Economics, University of London.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 1996 Jun;22(3):164-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.22.3.164.

DOI:10.1136/jme.22.3.164
PMID:8798939
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1376981/
Abstract

A review of medical ethics literature relating to the importance of the participation of patients in decision-making introduces the role of rights-based mediation as a voluntary process now being developed innovatively in America. This is discussed in relation to the theory of communicative ethics and moral personhood. References are then made to the work of medical ethics committees and the role of mediation within these. Finally it is suggested that mediation is part of an eirenic ethic already being used informally in good patient care, and that there is a case for developing it further.

摘要

一篇关于医学伦理文献中患者参与决策重要性的综述介绍了基于权利的调解作为一种自愿程序的作用,该程序目前正在美国进行创新性发展。这是结合交往伦理理论和道德人格进行讨论的。接着提到了医学伦理委员会的工作以及调解在其中的作用。最后指出,调解是一种已经在良好的患者护理中被非正式使用的和平伦理的一部分,并且有进一步发展它的理由。