Hallmon W W, Waldrop T C, Meffert R M, Wade B W
Baylor College of Dentistry, Dallas, Texas 75246, USA.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996 Jan-Feb;11(1):96-100.
This study compared the effects of metallic, nonmetallic, and sonic instrumentation on titanium abutment surfaces in vitro. Designated test surfaces in each of seven abutments were instrumented either for 25 strokes or 30 seconds, and for 50 strokes or 5 minutes. One abutment served as an untreated control. Scanning electron microscopy photomicrographs were coded and scored by five investigators and designated as smooth (comparable to control (0), slightly roughened, (1), moderately roughened (2), or severely roughened (3). Based on this investigation, the increasing order of surface alteration for each instrumentation was as follows: Implacare < Implant Support < Steri-Oss < Dynatip < Columbia 13/14 < Sonic scaler < Implarette scaler. The Implacare and Implant Support nonmetallic (plastic) scalers appear to be the instruments of choice for debridement of titanium abutment surfaces if preservation of surface integrity is the primary objective.
本研究在体外比较了金属器械、非金属器械和超声器械对钛基台表面的影响。对七个基台各自指定的测试表面进行器械处理,处理时间分别为25次划动或30秒,以及50次划动或5分钟。一个基台作为未处理的对照。扫描电子显微镜显微照片由五名研究人员编码并评分,分为光滑(与对照相当(0))、轻微粗糙(1)、中度粗糙(2)或严重粗糙(3)。基于此项研究,每种器械导致表面改变程度的递增顺序如下:Implacare < Implant Support < Steri - Oss < Dynatip < Columbia 13/14 < 超声洁牙器 < Implarette洁牙器。如果首要目标是保持表面完整性,那么Implacare和Implant Support非金属(塑料)洁牙器似乎是清洁钛基台表面的首选器械。