Glazier R H, Dalby D M, Badley E M, Hawker G A, Bell M J, Buchbinder R, Lineker S C
Arthritis Community Research and Evaluation Unit, Wellesley Hospital Research Institute, Toronto, Ont.
CMAJ. 1996 Sep 15;155(6):679-87.
To examine primary care physicians' management of rheumatoid arthritis, ascertain the determinants of management and compare management with that recommended by a current practice panel.
Mail survey (self-administered questionnaire).
Ontario.
A stratified computer-generated random sample of 798 members of the College of Family Physicians of Canada.
Proportions of respondents who chose various items in the management of two hypothetical patients, one with early rheumatoid arthritis and one with late rheumatoid arthritis. Scores for investigations, interventions and referrals for each scenario were generated by summing the recommended items chosen by respondents and then dividing by the total number of items recommended in that category. The scores were examined for their association with physician and practice characteristics and physician attitudes.
The response rate was 68.3% (529/775 eligible physicians). Recommended investigations were chosen by more than two thirds of the respondents for both scenarios. Referrals to physiotherapy, occupational therapy and rheumatology, all recommended by the panel, were chosen by 206 (38.9%), 72 (13.6%) and 309 (58.4%) physicians respectively for early rheumatoid arthritis. These proportions were significantly higher for late rheumatoid arthritis (p < 0.01). In multiple regression analysis, for early rheumatoid arthritis, internship or residency training in rheumatology was associated with higher investigation and intervention scores, for late rheumatoid arthritis, older physicians had higher intervention scores and female physicians had higher referral scores.
Primary care physicians' investigation of rheumatoid arthritis was in accord with panel recommendations. However, rates of referral to rheumatologists and other health care professionals were very low, especially for the early presentation of rheumatoid arthritis. More exposure to rheumatology and to the role of physiotherapy, occupational therapy and social work during primary care training is strongly recommended.
研究基层医疗医生对类风湿关节炎的管理,确定管理的决定因素,并将管理情况与当前实践小组推荐的方法进行比较。
邮寄调查(自填问卷)。
安大略省。
加拿大家庭医生学院798名成员的分层计算机生成随机样本。
在管理两名假设患者(一名早期类风湿关节炎患者和一名晚期类风湿关节炎患者)时选择各种项目的受访者比例。通过将受访者选择的推荐项目相加,然后除以该类别中推荐项目的总数,得出每种情况的检查、干预和转诊得分。研究这些得分与医生及执业特征和医生态度之间的关联。
回复率为68.3%(529/775名符合条件的医生)。两种情况下,超过三分之二的受访者选择了推荐的检查项目。对于早期类风湿关节炎,分别有206名(38.9%)、72名(13.6%)和309名(58.4%)医生选择了实践小组推荐的转至物理治疗、职业治疗和风湿病学专科的转诊建议。对于晚期类风湿关节炎,这些比例显著更高(p<0.01)。在多元回归分析中,对于早期类风湿关节炎,接受过风湿病学实习或住院医师培训与更高的检查和干预得分相关;对于晚期类风湿关节炎,年长的医生干预得分更高,女性医生转诊得分更高。
基层医疗医生对类风湿关节炎的检查符合实践小组的建议。然而,转诊至风湿病学家和其他医疗保健专业人员的比例非常低,尤其是对于早期类风湿关节炎患者。强烈建议在基层医疗培训期间增加对风湿病学以及物理治疗、职业治疗和社会工作作用的接触。