Moore H D, Akhondi M A
Department of Molecular Biology, University of Sheffield, UK.
J Androl. 1996 Jan-Feb;17(1):50-60.
Rat spermatozoa recovered from different regions of the excurrent ducts of 10 adult males (proximal cauda epididymidis [PC], distal cauda epididymidis [DC], and vas deferens [VD]) were assessed by in vitro fertilization (LVF) using limited sperm numbers, and by continuous evaluation of motility parameters during 5 hours of incubation in vitro with automated computer-aided sperm analysis (CASA). Spermatozoa from the PC region fertilized (68 +/- 6%) a significantly greater (P < or = 0.005) number of oocytes than those from the DC (44 + 5%) or VD (47 +/- 7%). For pooled samples from all three regions, the mean fertilization rate (51 +/- 14%) was less tan for spermatozoa from the PC (P < 0.05) but was not significantly different from spermatozoa from the DC or VD. For each time point and sample, 1,592 +/- 428 sperm tracks were analyzed. CASA was verified by comparison with manual still-frame analysis of video recordings, by repeated analysis of the same or different samples of spermatozoa, and by examination of computer tracks. The coefficients of variation for various motion parameters suggested that the CASA obtained a high degree of precision. There were no significant differences in motility parameters for spermatozoa recovered from equivalent regions of the left or right tract or in motility parameters for spermatozoa from different regions of the tract immediately after recovery. However, during incubation in vitro, spermatozoa from the DC or VD regions exhibited a marked decline in straight-line velocity (VSL) compared with spermatozoa from the PC region. The reduction in VSL (combined values from right and left tract) for DC or VD spermatozoa compared with PC spermatozoa was significant at 2.5 hours of incubation (P < or = 0.05) and highly significant (P < or = 0.005) by the end of the incubation period. Differences in average path velocity (VAP) were also apparent after 4 hours (p < or = 0.05), but no significant differences were observed for measurements of curvilinear velocity (VCL) or lateral bead displacement (ALH). Overall, the decline in VSL over 5 hours was highly correlated (P < or = 0.001) with the outcome of fertilization in vitro. In contrast, initial VSL and changes in VCL of spermatozoa were not correlated with fertilization rate. These results indicate that the in vitro fertilizing capacity of rat spermatozoa is correlated with 1) the decline in straight-line velocity (VSL) as measured by repeated CASA during incubation in vitro and 2) with the site of recovery of mature rat spermatozoa from the distal excurrent duct. It is suggested that the deterioration of the quality of rat spermatozoa in the distal epididymidis and vas deferens during storage may occur sooner than previously realized, and therefore care must be taken when recovering samples for fertility assessment. In keeping with findings in other species, immediate "snapshot" analysis of rat motility was a poor predictor of sperm fertility. In contrast, continuous CASA provided significant information for determining sperm fertilizing capacity and will be a useful technique for reproductive toxicology.
从10只成年雄性大鼠的输出管不同区域(附睾尾近端[PC]、附睾尾远端[DC]和输精管[VD])采集的精子,通过使用有限数量精子的体外受精(IVF),以及在体外孵育5小时期间利用自动计算机辅助精子分析(CASA)持续评估运动参数来进行评估。来自PC区域的精子使卵母细胞受精的数量(68±6%)显著多于来自DC区域(44±5%)或VD区域(47±7%)的精子(P≤0.005)。对于来自所有三个区域的混合样本,平均受精率(51±14%)低于来自PC区域的精子(P<0.05),但与来自DC或VD区域的精子没有显著差异。对于每个时间点和样本,分析了1592±428条精子轨迹。通过与视频记录的手动静态帧分析进行比较、对相同或不同精子样本进行重复分析以及检查计算机轨迹,对CASA进行了验证。各种运动参数的变异系数表明CASA获得了高度的精确性。从左、右生殖道相同区域采集的精子的运动参数,或刚采集后来自生殖道不同区域的精子的运动参数,均无显著差异。然而,在体外孵育期间,与来自PC区域的精子相比,来自DC或VD区域的精子的直线速度(VSL)显著下降。与PC精子相比,DC或VD精子在孵育2.5小时时VSL的降低(左右生殖道的合并值)具有显著性(P≤0.05),到孵育期结束时具有高度显著性(P≤0.005)。4小时后平均路径速度(VAP)的差异也很明显(P≤0.05),但曲线速度(VCL)或侧向头位移(ALH)的测量值没有显著差异。总体而言,5小时内VSL的下降与体外受精的结果高度相关(P≤0.001)。相比之下,精子的初始VSL和VCL的变化与受精率无关。这些结果表明,大鼠精子的体外受精能力与以下因素相关:1)在体外孵育期间通过重复CASA测量的直线速度(VSL)的下降;2)从远端输出管采集成熟大鼠精子的部位。提示大鼠精子在附睾远端和输精管储存期间质量的恶化可能比以前认识到的更早发生,因此在采集用于生育力评估的样本时必须谨慎。与其他物种的研究结果一致,对大鼠运动能力的即时“快照”分析不能很好地预测精子的生育力。相比之下,连续CASA为确定精子受精能力提供了重要信息,将是生殖毒理学中的一项有用技术。