• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

口吃成年人与非口吃成年人的在线句子处理

Online sentence processing in adults who stutter and adults who do not stutter.

作者信息

Bosshardt H G, Fransen H

机构信息

Fakultät für Psychologie, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Germany.

出版信息

J Speech Hear Res. 1996 Aug;39(4):785-97. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3904.785.

DOI:10.1044/jshr.3904.785
PMID:8844558
Abstract

This study had two specific aims. The first aim was to investigate whether, during a silent reading task, persons who stutter encode phonological and semantic information move slowly then persons who do not stutter. The second aim was to investigate how the syntactic context of stimulus sentences influences the speed of coding. Fourteen adult persons who stutter and 14 adult persons who do not stutter participated in a self-paced word-by-word reading experiment. While reading a prose text silently, participants monitored target words that were specified before the presentation of the text. The target words to be monitored for were phonologically similar, categorically related, or identical to a cue word. The influence of syntactic information on the word-monitoring reaction time was studied by presenting the text either as normal prose, in a syntactically correct but semantically anomalous version, or in random word order. The results suggest that the two groups are not different with respect to the speed of word identification but that persons who stutter retrieve semantic information more slowly than persons who do not stutter.

摘要

本研究有两个具体目标。第一个目标是调查在默读任务期间,口吃者在对语音和语义信息进行编码时是否比非口吃者速度慢。第二个目标是研究刺激句子的句法上下文如何影响编码速度。14名成年口吃者和14名成年非口吃者参与了一项自定节奏的逐字阅读实验。在默读一篇散文文本时,参与者监测在文本呈现之前指定的目标单词。需要监测的目标单词在语音上相似、类别相关或与一个提示词相同。通过将文本呈现为正常散文、句法正确但语义异常的版本或随机单词顺序,研究句法信息对单词监测反应时间的影响。结果表明,两组在单词识别速度方面没有差异,但口吃者比非口吃者检索语义信息的速度更慢。

相似文献

1
Online sentence processing in adults who stutter and adults who do not stutter.口吃成年人与非口吃成年人的在线句子处理
J Speech Hear Res. 1996 Aug;39(4):785-97. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3904.785.
2
Cognitive processing load as a determinant of stuttering: summary of a research programme.作为口吃决定因素的认知加工负荷:一项研究计划综述
Clin Linguist Phon. 2006 Jul;20(5):371-85. doi: 10.1080/02699200500074321.
3
Phoneme monitoring in silent naming and perception in adults who stutter.口吃成年人在无声命名和感知中的音素监测
J Fluency Disord. 2006;31(4):284-302. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2006.08.001. Epub 2006 Sep 18.
4
Phonological priming in adults who stutter.口吃成人的语音启动。
J Fluency Disord. 2012 Jun;37(2):91-105. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2012.01.001. Epub 2012 Jan 17.
5
Effects of concurrent cognitive processing on the fluency of word repetition: comparison between persons who do and do not stutter.同时进行认知加工对单词重复流畅性的影响:口吃者与非口吃者的比较。
J Fluency Disord. 2002 Summer;27(2):93-113; quiz 113-4. doi: 10.1016/s0094-730x(02)00113-4.
6
The effect of syntactic structure upon speech initiation times of stuttering and nonstuttering speakers.句法结构对口吃者和非口吃者言语起始时间的影响。
J Fluency Disord. 2003 Spring;28(1):17-35. doi: 10.1016/s0094-730x(03)00003-2.
7
Effects of syntactic complexity and sentence-structure priming on speech initiation time in adults who stutter.口吃者言语起始时间的句法复杂度和句子结构启动效应。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2009 Dec;52(6):1623-39. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0063).
8
Effects of category and rhyme decisions on sentence production.类别和韵律判断对句子生成的影响。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2002 Oct;45(5):844-57. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2002/068).
9
Phonological neighborhood effect in spontaneous speech in adults who stutter.口吃成年人自发言语中的语音邻域效应。
J Fluency Disord. 2018 Dec;58:86-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2018.08.005. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
10
Nonword repetition and phoneme elision in adults who do and do not stutter: Vocal versus nonvocal performance differences.有口吃和无口吃成年人的非词重复与音素省略:发声与非发声表现差异
J Fluency Disord. 2015 Jun;44:17-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2015.01.004. Epub 2015 Jan 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Lexical Planning in People Who Stutter: A Defect in Lexical Encoding or the Planning Scope?口吃者的词汇规划:词汇编码缺陷还是规划范围问题?
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 23;12:581304. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.581304. eCollection 2021.
2
Neural Indices of Semantic Processing in Early Childhood Distinguish Eventual Stuttering Persistence and Recovery.幼儿期语义加工的神经指标可区分口吃最终的持续和恢复情况。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Nov 9;60(11):3118-3134. doi: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-S-17-0081.
3
Semantic and Phonological Encoding Times in Adults Who Stutter: Brain Electrophysiological Evidence.
口吃成年人的语义和语音编码时间:脑电生理证据。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Oct 17;60(10):2906-2923. doi: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-L-16-0309.
4
The Influence of Executive Functions on Phonemic Processing in Children Who Do and Do Not Stutter.执行功能对有口吃和无口吃儿童语音加工的影响。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Oct 17;60(10):2792-2807. doi: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-S-17-0033.
5
Attention demands of language production in adults who stutter.口吃成年人语言产生的注意力需求。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2016 Apr;127(4):1942-60. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2016.01.016. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
6
Early childhood stuttering and electrophysiological indices of language processing.儿童早期口吃与语言处理的电生理学指标。
J Fluency Disord. 2013 Jun;38(2):206-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2013.01.001. Epub 2013 Jan 20.
7
Exploring semantic and phonological picture-word priming in adults who stutter using event-related potentials.使用事件相关电位技术探索口吃成人的语义和语音图片-词汇启动效应。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2012 Jun;123(6):1131-46. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.10.003. Epub 2011 Nov 4.
8
Sentence-structure priming in young children who do and do not stutter.口吃和不口吃幼儿的句子结构启动效应
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2004 Jun;47(3):552-71. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2004/043).
9
Spontaneous imitation of fundamental frequency and speech rate by nonstutterers and stutterers.非口吃者和口吃者对基频和语速的自发模仿。
J Psycholinguist Res. 1997 Jul;26(4):425-48. doi: 10.1023/a:1025030120016.