• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用诺马斯基干涉对比显微镜进行痰液筛查。

Sputum screening by Nomarski interference contrast microscopy.

作者信息

Welch D F, Kelly M T

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Apr;9(4):520-4. doi: 10.1128/jcm.9.4.520-524.1979.

DOI:10.1128/jcm.9.4.520-524.1979
PMID:88462
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC273067/
Abstract

Gram-stained smears of specimens submitted for sputum cultures were compared with direct wet mounts examined by Nomarski interference contrast microscopy (NIM) for enumeration of squamous epithelial cells (EPC) and leukocytes (WBC). The results obtained by the two methods were comparable, but specimens were more rapidly screened and cell types were more readily differentiated by NIM. Specimens submitted for sputum culture over a 3-month period were examined for EPC and WBC by NIM. Twenty-two percent of the specimens had greater than 25 EPC/field or a predominance of EPC (class I), 30% had greater than 25 EPC and greater than 25 WBC/field (class II), and 48% had greater than 25 WBC/field or a predominance of WBC (class III). The clinical relevance of the culture results was determined by reviewing the records of patients whose specimens were included in the study. Class I specimens provided only 30% clinically relevant culture results. Specimens in class II provided useful culture results in 63% of the patients, and 96% of those in class III provided clinically relevant information. The results confirm the value of sputum screening and demonstrate that NIM provides a rapid, simple, and accurate method for sputum screening.

摘要

将提交进行痰培养的标本的革兰氏染色涂片与通过诺马斯基干涉对比显微镜(NIM)检查的直接湿涂片进行比较,以计数鳞状上皮细胞(EPC)和白细胞(WBC)。两种方法获得的结果具有可比性,但通过NIM对标本进行筛查更快,且细胞类型更容易区分。对3个月期间提交进行痰培养的标本通过NIM检查EPC和WBC。22%的标本每视野EPC大于25个或EPC占优势(I类),30%的标本每视野EPC大于25个且WBC大于25个(II类),48%的标本每视野WBC大于25个或WBC占优势(III类)。通过查阅纳入研究的患者记录来确定培养结果的临床相关性。I类标本仅提供30%具有临床相关性的培养结果。II类标本在63%的患者中提供了有用的培养结果,III类标本中96%提供了具有临床相关性的信息。结果证实了痰筛查的价值,并表明NIM为痰筛查提供了一种快速、简单且准确的方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e06/273067/0d492a02396d/jcm00189-0094-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e06/273067/0d492a02396d/jcm00189-0094-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e06/273067/0d492a02396d/jcm00189-0094-a.jpg

相似文献

1
Sputum screening by Nomarski interference contrast microscopy.用诺马斯基干涉对比显微镜进行痰液筛查。
J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Apr;9(4):520-4. doi: 10.1128/jcm.9.4.520-524.1979.
2
Etiological diagnosis of bacterial pneumonia by gram stain and quantitative culture of expectorates. Leukocytes or alveolar macrophages as indicators of sample representativity.通过痰液革兰氏染色和定量培养进行细菌性肺炎的病因诊断。以白细胞或肺泡巨噬细胞作为样本代表性的指标。
Scand J Infect Dis. 1983;15(2):153-60. doi: 10.3109/inf.1983.15.issue-2.05.
3
Nonvalue of sputum culture in the management of lower respiratory tract infections.痰培养在治疗下呼吸道感染中的无价值性。
J Clin Microbiol. 1987 May;25(5):758-62. doi: 10.1128/jcm.25.5.758-762.1987.
4
Microscopic and bacteriological comparison of paired sputa and transtracheal aspirates.配对痰液与经气管吸出物的显微镜及细菌学比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 1977 Oct;6(4):396-9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.6.4.396-399.1977.
5
Experience with a microscopic screening program for sputum specimens.痰液标本显微镜筛查项目的经验
Health Lab Sci. 1977 Jan;14(1):17-21.
6
Effects of overnight refrigeration on the microscopic evaluation of sputum.过夜冷藏对痰液显微镜检查结果的影响。
J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Feb;19(2):161-3. doi: 10.1128/jcm.19.2.161-163.1984.
7
Comparison of Gram stain and Nomarski optics for screening sputum specimens before culture.革兰氏染色与微分干涉差显微镜在痰液标本培养前筛查中的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Feb;23(2):377-8. doi: 10.1128/jcm.23.2.377-378.1986.
8
Evaluation of sputum gram stain.痰液革兰氏染色评估
Clin Infect Dis. 1992 Dec;15(6):1048-9. doi: 10.1093/clind/15.6.1048.
9
The value of fluorescence microscopy of auramine stained sputum smears for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis.金胺染色痰涂片荧光显微镜检查对肺结核诊断的价值。
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1998 Dec;29(4):860-3.
10
Diagnostic value of microscopic examination of Gram-stained sputum and sputum cultures in patients with bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia.革兰氏染色痰液显微镜检查和痰培养对菌血症性肺炎球菌肺炎患者的诊断价值。
Clin Infect Dis. 2004 Jul 15;39(2):165-9. doi: 10.1086/421497. Epub 2004 Jul 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Differentiation of Haemophilus spp. in Respiratory isolate cultures by an indole spot test.通过吲哚斑点试验对呼吸道分离培养物中的嗜血杆菌属进行鉴别。
J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Feb;15(2):216-9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.2.216-219.1982.
2
Comparison of Gram stain and Nomarski optics for screening sputum specimens before culture.革兰氏染色与微分干涉差显微镜在痰液标本培养前筛查中的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Feb;23(2):377-8. doi: 10.1128/jcm.23.2.377-378.1986.

本文引用的文献

1
Transtracheal aspiration in the evaluation of patients with pneumonia.经气管吸引术在肺炎患者评估中的应用
Ann Intern Med. 1970 Feb;72(2):183-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-72-2-183.
2
The nonvalue of sputum culture in the diagnosis of pneumococcal pneumonia.痰培养在肺炎球菌肺炎诊断中的无价值性。
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1971 Jun;103(6):845-8. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1971.103.6.845.
3
Examination of sputum cells.痰液细胞检查。
N Engl J Med. 1970 Apr 9;282(15):854-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197004092821507.
4
Constituents of sputum: a simple method.痰液的成分:一种简单的方法。
Ann Intern Med. 1972 Aug;77(2):259-65. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-77-2-259.
5
Lung biopsy in immunocompromised hosts.免疫功能低下宿主的肺活检
Am J Med. 1975 Oct;59(4):488-96. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(75)90256-9.
6
Microscopic and baceriologic analysis of expectorated sputum.咳出痰液的显微镜及细菌学分析。
Mayo Clin Proc. 1975 Jun;50(6):339-44.
7
Bacterial sputum cultures. A clinician's viewpoint.细菌痰液培养。临床医生的观点。
Mayo Clin Proc. 1977 Jan;52(1):39-41.
8
Misinformation from sputum cultures without microscopic examination.未经显微镜检查的痰培养结果存在错误信息。
J Clin Microbiol. 1977 Nov;6(5):518-27. doi: 10.1128/jcm.6.5.518-527.1977.
9
Microscopic and bacteriological comparison of paired sputa and transtracheal aspirates.配对痰液与经气管吸出物的显微镜及细菌学比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 1977 Oct;6(4):396-9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.6.4.396-399.1977.