Suppr超能文献

门诊护理的重要因素:患者与医生观点的比较

Important elements of outpatient care: a comparison of patients' and physicians' opinions.

作者信息

Laine C, Davidoff F, Lewis C E, Nelson E C, Nelson E, Kessler R C, Delbanco T L

机构信息

Jefferson Medical College, Center for Research in Medical Education and Health Care, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 1996 Oct 15;125(8):640-5. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-125-8-199610150-00003.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare patients' and physicians' opinions on the importance of discrete elements of health care as determinants of the quality of outpatient care.

DESIGN

Analysis of results of a mailed survey.

SETTING

Community-based internal medicine practices.

PARTICIPANTS

74 general internists and 814 patients randomly selected from the practices of these internists.

MEASURES

125 elements of care that covered nine domains were identified: physician clinical skill, physician interpersonal skill, support staff, office environment, provision of information, patient involvement, nonfinancial access, finances, and coordination of care. Participants rated each element on its importance to high-quality care on a 4-point scale: 1 = not important; 2 = of medium importance; 3 = of high importance; and 4 = essential. Patients' and physicians' ratings were compared for individual elements of care and for elements aggregated into domains.

RESULTS

Survey response rates were 93% for physicians and 60% for patients. In an element-by-element comparison of ratings, ratings by the two groups differed substantially for 58% of the attributes. The most striking difference was seen in the domain of provision of information (median ratings, 3.56 for patients and 2.85 for physicians; P < 0.001). Ratings by the two groups also differed in the domains of clinical skill (3.75 for patients and 3.35 for physicians; P < 0.001), nonfinancial access (3.00 for patients and 2.87 for physicians; P < 0.001), and finances (3.00 for patients and 2.80 for physicians; P = 0.006). When relative rankings of the domains were compared, both groups agreed that clinical skill is most important; however, patients ranked provision of information second in importance whereas physicians ranked it sixth.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients and physicians agreed that the most crucial element of outpatient care is clinical skill, but they disagreed about the relative importance of other aspects of care, particularly effective communication of health-related information. These differences in perception may influence the quality of interactions between physicians and patients.

摘要

目的

比较患者与医生对于医疗保健中不同要素作为门诊医疗质量决定因素的重要性的看法。

设计

对邮寄调查结果进行分析。

地点

社区内科诊所。

参与者

从这些内科医生的诊所中随机选取的74名普通内科医生和814名患者。

测量指标

确定了涵盖九个领域的125项医疗要素:医生临床技能、医生人际技能、辅助人员、办公环境、信息提供、患者参与、非财务可及性、财务以及医疗协调。参与者按照以下4分制对每项要素对于高质量医疗的重要性进行评分:1 = 不重要;2 = 中等重要;3 = 非常重要;4 = 至关重要。比较了患者和医生对各项医疗要素以及汇总到各领域的要素的评分。

结果

医生的调查回复率为93%,患者为60%。在逐项评分比较中,两组对58%的属性评分差异显著。最显著的差异出现在信息提供领域(患者的中位数评分为3.56,医生为2.85;P < 0.001)。两组在临床技能领域(患者为3.75,医生为3.35;P < 0.001)、非财务可及性领域(患者为3.00,医生为2.87;P < 0.001)以及财务领域(患者为3.00,医生为2.80;P = 0.006)的评分也存在差异。在比较各领域的相对排名时,两组都认为临床技能最为重要;然而,患者将信息提供列为第二重要,而医生将其列为第六重要。

结论

患者和医生一致认为门诊医疗中最关键的要素是临床技能,但他们在医疗其他方面的相对重要性上存在分歧,尤其是与健康相关信息的有效沟通。这些认知差异可能会影响医患互动的质量。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验