Porter S, Ryan S
Queen's University of Belfast, Northern Ireland.
J Adv Nurs. 1996 Aug;24(2):413-20. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1996.19126.x.
This paper is a response to the challenges laid down by Hannah Cooke in a paper in the Journal of Advanced Nursing entitled "Boundary work in the nursing curriculum: the case of sociology' (Cooke 1993a). In her paper, Cooke noted that the outlook of nursing and sociology are inimicable because nursing's concentration on individuals is at variance with sociology's concern with wider social issues. We argue that it is possible for nursing research to give due attention to social structures without losing its focus on individuals. One methodology that could facilitate this broadening of nursing's epistemological boundaries is critical realist ethnography, which works under the assumption that the relationship between social structures and individual actors involves a two-way process, in that while the enablements and constraints imposed by structures influence individual actions, those actions in turn either maintain or transform social structures. To demonstrate how such a methodology could be applied in nursing research, we work through a case study concerning the theory-practice gap, arguing that the gap is neither the result of clinicians' ignorance of nor antipathy to theory, but is largely generated by the lack of resources enjoyed by nurses, which in turn is a reflection of the social structure of capitalism within which nurses operate.
本文是对汉娜·库克(Hannah Cooke)在《高级护理杂志》上发表的一篇题为《护理课程中的边界工作:以社会学为例》(库克,1993a)的论文所提出挑战的回应。在她的论文中,库克指出护理与社会学的观点是相互对立的,因为护理专注于个体,这与社会学对更广泛社会问题的关注不一致。我们认为,护理研究有可能在不偏离对个体关注的前提下,对社会结构给予应有的关注。一种有助于拓宽护理认识论边界的方法是批判实在论民族志,其运作基于这样一种假设,即社会结构与个体行动者之间的关系涉及一个双向过程,也就是说,虽然结构施加的促成因素和限制因素会影响个体行动,但这些行动反过来又会维持或改变社会结构。为了说明这种方法如何应用于护理研究,我们通过一个关于理论与实践差距的案例研究展开论述,认为这种差距既不是临床医生对理论无知或反感的结果,很大程度上是由护士所拥有资源的匮乏造成的,而这反过来又反映了护士所处的资本主义社会结构。