Siegel R E, Halpern N A, Almenoff P L, Lee A, Cashin R, Greene J G
Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Bronx (NY) Veterans Affairs Medical Center 10468, USA.
Chest. 1996 Oct;110(4):965-71. doi: 10.1378/chest.110.4.965.
To compare therapeutic outcome and perform a cost-benefit analysis of inpatients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) treated with a shortened course of i.v. antibiotic therapy.
A prospective, randomized, parallel group study with a follow-up period of 28 days.
Bronx Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC) and the Castle Point VAMC; university-affiliated VAMC general medical wards from September 1993 to March 1995.
Seventy-two male veterans and 1 female veteran with 75 episodes of CAP defined by a new infiltrate on chest radiograph and either history or physical findings consistent with pneumonia. Study population was 42%(31) black, 33%(24) white, and 25%(18) Hispanic.
Patients were randomized (1:1:1) to 1 of 3 treatment groups: group 1 received 2 days of i.v. and 8 days of oral therapy; group 2 received 5 days of i.v. and 5 days of oral therapy; and group 3 received 10 days of i.v. therapy. Antibiotics consisted of cefuroxime, 750 mg every 8 h for the i.v. course, and cefuroxime axetil, 500 mg every 12 h for the oral therapy.
No differences were found in the clinical course, cure rates, or resolution of chest radiograph abnormalities among the three groups. A significant difference was found in the length of stay (LOS) among the three groups. The mean +/- SD LOS was 6 +/- 3 days in group 1, 8 +/- 2 days in group 2, and 11 +/- 1 days in group 3. The shortened LOS could potentially save $95.5 million for the Department of Veterans Affairs and $2.9 billion for the US private sector.
Adult patients hospitalized for CAP who are not severely ill can be successfully treated with an abbreviated (2-day) course of i.v. antibiotics and then switched to oral therapy. A longer course of i.v. therapy prolongs hospital stay and cost, without improving the therapeutic cure rate.
比较接受短疗程静脉抗生素治疗的社区获得性肺炎(CAP)住院患者的治疗效果,并进行成本效益分析。
一项前瞻性、随机、平行组研究,随访期为28天。
布朗克斯退伍军人事务医疗中心(VAMC)和卡斯尔波因特VAMC;1993年9月至1995年3月大学附属VAMC综合内科病房。
72名男性退伍军人和1名女性退伍军人,共发生75次CAP,通过胸部X光片上新出现的浸润影以及与肺炎相符的病史或体格检查结果来定义。研究人群中42%(31人)为黑人,33%(24人)为白人,25%(18人)为西班牙裔。
患者被随机(1:1:1)分为3个治疗组之一:第1组接受2天静脉治疗和8天口服治疗;第2组接受5天静脉治疗和5天口服治疗;第3组接受10天静脉治疗。抗生素包括静脉疗程中每8小时750毫克头孢呋辛,口服治疗中每12小时500毫克头孢呋辛酯。
三组在临床病程、治愈率或胸部X光片异常的消退方面均未发现差异。三组在住院时间(LOS)上存在显著差异。第1组的平均±标准差LOS为6±3天,第2组为8±2天,第3组为11±1天。缩短的住院时间可能为退伍军人事务部节省9550万美元,为美国私营部门节省29亿美元。
因CAP住院的非重症成年患者可以通过短疗程(2天)静脉抗生素治疗,然后转为口服治疗而成功治愈。更长疗程的静脉治疗会延长住院时间和成本,而不会提高治疗治愈率。