Suppr超能文献

颈动脉内膜切除术:是否需要留置分流管?

Carotid endarterectomy: is an indwelling shunt necessary?

作者信息

Baker W H, Dorner D B, Barnes R W

出版信息

Surgery. 1977 Sep;82(3):321-6.

PMID:888097
Abstract

Three hundred and four consecutive endarterectomies were performed with general anesthesia and without a temporary indwelling shunt. Eight patients (2.6%) awoke from anesthesia with a new neurological deficit. Eight additional patients later developed neurological symptoms, suggesting that the absence of a shunt did not contribute to their complication. Of these 16 patients, two (0.6%) died, nine (3.0%) had a temporary neurological deficit, and five (1.6%) had a permanent neurological deficit. A prolonged occlusion time, a stump pressure of less than 50 mm Hg, or the presence of additional carotid lesions did not show a significant statistical relationship to postoperative neurological deficit.

摘要

连续进行了304例全身麻醉且未使用临时留置分流管的动脉内膜切除术。8例患者(2.6%)麻醉苏醒后出现新的神经功能缺损。另有8例患者随后出现神经症状,提示未使用分流管与他们的并发症无关。在这16例患者中,2例(0.6%)死亡,9例(3.0%)有暂时性神经功能缺损,5例(1.6%)有永久性神经功能缺损。闭塞时间延长、残端压力低于50 mmHg或存在其他颈动脉病变与术后神经功能缺损无显著统计学关系。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验