La Veist T A
Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA.
Ethn Dis. 1996 Winter-Spring;6(1-2):21-9.
For at least a century, American medical and public health researchers have used race as a marker for biology, and have documented race-associated differences in health and illness behavior. The research has often been inappropriate and has led to abuses and erroneous conclusions about the role played by race in the production of disparities in health status. Consequently, some researchers have begun to advocate the abolition of medical and public health research using race. In this essay, I argue that, although the arguments against continuing to study race have some merit, more rather than fewer studies of race are needed. Researchers should be more careful in the use of race and more conscious of the limitations of the race concept.
至少一个世纪以来,美国医学和公共卫生研究人员一直将种族作为生物学的一个标志,并记录了与种族相关的健康和疾病行为差异。这项研究往往并不恰当,导致了对种族在健康状况差异产生中所起作用的滥用和错误结论。因此,一些研究人员开始主张废除使用种族的医学和公共卫生研究。在本文中,我认为,尽管反对继续研究种族的论点有一定道理,但需要进行更多而非更少的种族研究。研究人员在使用种族时应更加谨慎,并更清楚地意识到种族概念的局限性。