• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

右胃网膜动脉移植物在冠状动脉血运重建中的血流竞争

Flow competition of the right gastroepiploic artery graft in coronary revascularization.

作者信息

Uchida N, Kawaue Y

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hiroshima General Hospital, Japan.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 1996 Nov;62(5):1342-6. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(96)00480-8.

DOI:10.1016/0003-4975(96)00480-8
PMID:8893566
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In recent years, there has been a substantial increase in the use of arterial grafts for coronary revascularization. Arterial grafts are more vulnerable than saphenous vein grafts to hypoperfusion syndrome. The purpose of this study was to examine flow competition between the right gastroepiploic artery and native coronary arteries in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.

METHODS

Between December 1989 and July 1995, 182 patients underwent coronary artery bypass grafting using the right gastroepiploic artery. Coronary flow patterns were examined in 172 patients by postoperative angiography. Flow patterns were divided into four types: right gastroepiploic artery dependent (n = 128), balanced (n = 24), native dependent (n = 18), or occluded (n = 2).

RESULTS

All grafts with an old myocardial infarction (n = 75) and 94% of grafts with 99% stenosis (n = 16) were classified in the right gastroepiploic artery-dependent category. In patients with angina pectoris, flow patterns were more frequently classified as right gastroepiploic artery dependent, with increasingly severe native coronary artery proximal stenoses (99% > 90% > 75%) or with stenoses more distal in location.

CONCLUSIONS

Flow competition depended on three factors: the viability of the revascularized area, the degree of proximal stenosis, and the location of stenosis. Right gastroepiploic artery grafts should be selected for coronary artery bypass grafting with consideration of these three factors.

摘要

背景

近年来,用于冠状动脉血运重建的动脉移植物的使用显著增加。动脉移植物比大隐静脉移植物更容易发生低灌注综合征。本研究的目的是在接受冠状动脉旁路移植术的患者中检查胃网膜右动脉与自身冠状动脉之间的血流竞争情况。

方法

1989年12月至1995年7月期间,182例患者接受了使用胃网膜右动脉的冠状动脉旁路移植术。172例患者术后通过血管造影检查冠状动脉血流模式。血流模式分为四种类型:胃网膜右动脉依赖型(n = 128)、平衡型(n = 24)、自身依赖型(n = 18)或闭塞型(n = 2)。

结果

所有有陈旧性心肌梗死的移植物(n = 75)和94%有99%狭窄的移植物(n = 16)被归类为胃网膜右动脉依赖型。在心绞痛患者中,血流模式更常被归类为胃网膜右动脉依赖型,随着自身冠状动脉近端狭窄程度加重(99%>90%>75%)或狭窄位置更靠远端。

结论

血流竞争取决于三个因素:血运重建区域的活力、近端狭窄程度和狭窄位置。在进行冠状动脉旁路移植术时,应考虑这三个因素来选择胃网膜右动脉移植物。

相似文献

1
Flow competition of the right gastroepiploic artery graft in coronary revascularization.右胃网膜动脉移植物在冠状动脉血运重建中的血流竞争
Ann Thorac Surg. 1996 Nov;62(5):1342-6. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(96)00480-8.
2
Clinical evaluation with exercise performance in twenty patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting with both the gastroepiploic and internal thoracic arteries.对20例同时采用胃网膜动脉和胸廓内动脉进行冠状动脉旁路移植术患者的运动表现进行临床评估。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1993 Jun;105(6):1088-94.
3
Arterial revascularization with the right gastroepiploic artery and internal mammary arteries in 300 patients.对300例患者采用右胃网膜动脉和乳内动脉进行动脉血运重建。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1994 May;107(5):1309-15; discussion 1315-6.
4
Differences in vasoreactivity between gastroepiploic artery grafts late after bypass surgery and grafted coronary arteries.搭桥手术后晚期胃网膜动脉移植物与移植冠状动脉之间血管反应性的差异。
Circulation. 1994 Nov;90(5 Pt 2):II155-9.
5
[Flow competition of right gastroepiploic artery graft in coronary artery bypass surgery].[冠状动脉搭桥手术中右胃网膜动脉移植的血流竞争]
Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 1995 Jul;43(7):997-1003.
6
The right gastroepiploic artery graft. Clinical and angiographic midterm results in 200 patients.右胃网膜动脉移植。200例患者的临床及血管造影中期结果。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1993 Apr;105(4):615-22; discussion 623.
7
Right gastroepiploic artery used for coronary artery bypass grafting. Evaluation of flow characteristics and size.用于冠状动脉搭桥术的胃网膜右动脉。血流特性和尺寸评估。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1993 Oct;106(4):579-85; discussion 586.
8
Effect of coronary artery bypass grafting on native coronary artery stenosis. Comparison of internal thoracic artery and saphenous vein grafts.冠状动脉旁路移植术对自身冠状动脉狭窄的影响。胸廓内动脉与大隐静脉移植血管的比较。
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2001 Apr;42(2):159-64.
9
Angiographic predictors of 3-year patency of bypass grafts implanted on the right coronary artery system: a prospective randomized comparison of gastroepiploic artery, saphenous vein, and right internal thoracic artery grafts.右冠状动脉系统旁路移植 3 年通畅率的血管造影预测因素:胃网膜动脉、大隐静脉和右内乳动脉移植物的前瞻性随机比较。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011 Nov;142(5):980-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.07.017.
10
Coronary artery bypass grafting with the right gastroepiploic artery.采用右胃网膜动脉进行冠状动脉旁路移植术。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1989 Jun;97(6):826-31.

引用本文的文献

1
Influence of residual coronary flow on bypass graft flow for graft assessment using near-infrared fluorescence angiography.应用近红外荧光血管造影评估旁路移植血管时,残余冠状动脉血流对桥血流量的影响。
Surg Today. 2020 Jan;50(1):76-83. doi: 10.1007/s00595-019-01850-5. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
2
Sequential bypass using the right gastroepiploic artery for coronary artery bypass grafting.使用胃网膜右动脉进行冠状动脉旁路移植术的序贯搭桥。
Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003 Jul;51(7):277-81. doi: 10.1007/BF02719378.
3
Coronary revascularization in the 21st century. Emphasis on contributions by Japanese surgeons.
21世纪的冠状动脉血运重建。重点介绍日本外科医生的贡献。
Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002 Dec;50(12):541-53. doi: 10.1007/BF02913172.
4
[Clinical evaluation of right gastroepiploic artery (RGEA) graft--comparison of RGEA with right internal thoracic artery (RITA) graft in the coronary bypass grafting (CABG) operation using only arterial grafts].[胃网膜右动脉(RGEA)移植物的临床评估——在仅使用动脉移植物的冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)中RGEA与右胸廓内动脉(RITA)移植物的比较]
Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998 Jun;46(6):538-43. doi: 10.1007/BF03250596.
5
"Hexatuple" coronary bypass with in situ arterial grafts.采用原位动脉移植物的“六重”冠状动脉搭桥术。
Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998 May;46(5):402-5. doi: 10.1007/BF03217763.