• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用肘拐进行摆动通过步态时的能量消耗、机械功和肌肉效率。

Energy cost, mechanical work and muscular efficiency in swing-through gait with elbow crutches.

作者信息

Thys H, Willems P A, Saels P

机构信息

Laboratoire de Physiologie Humaine Appliquée, Université de Liège, Sart Tilman, Belgium.

出版信息

J Biomech. 1996 Nov;29(11):1473-82. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(96)84543-x.

DOI:10.1016/0021-9290(96)84543-x
PMID:8894928
Abstract

Crutches are widely used to assist ambulation in disabled people. Many authors have shown that the use of crutches increases the energy cost as compared to normal walking. In this study we have measured the energy consumed and the mechanical work performed during swing-through crutch gait in order to assess if the greater energy expenditure is accompanied by an equivalent increase of the work done to move the body. Our results show that, depending upon the speed, the energy expenditure is 2-3 times higher in swing-through gait than in normal walking. On the other hand, the mechanical work increases only 1.3-1.5 times. Thus the extra cost of swing-through gait cannot be explained solely by an increase of the mechanical work, but is due at least in part to a reduction in the efficiency of positive work production.

摘要

拐杖被广泛用于辅助残疾人行走。许多作者已经表明,与正常行走相比,使用拐杖会增加能量消耗。在本研究中,我们测量了摆动式拐杖步态过程中消耗的能量和所做的机械功,以评估更高的能量消耗是否伴随着身体移动所做功的同等增加。我们的结果表明,根据速度不同,摆动式步态的能量消耗比正常行走高2至3倍。另一方面,机械功仅增加1.3至1.5倍。因此,摆动式步态的额外成本不能仅通过机械功的增加来解释,至少部分是由于正功产生效率的降低。

相似文献

1
Energy cost, mechanical work and muscular efficiency in swing-through gait with elbow crutches.使用肘拐进行摆动通过步态时的能量消耗、机械功和肌肉效率。
J Biomech. 1996 Nov;29(11):1473-82. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(96)84543-x.
2
Energy cost, exercise intensity, and gait efficiency of standard versus rocker-bottom axillary crutch walking.标准腋拐与摇椅底腋拐行走的能量消耗、运动强度及步态效率
Phys Ther. 1990 Aug;70(8):487-93. doi: 10.1093/ptj/70.8.487.
3
Comments on "Energy cost, mechanical work and muscular efficiency in swing-through gait with elbow crutches".关于“使用肘拐进行摆动通过步态时的能量消耗、机械功和肌肉效率”的评论
J Biomech. 1997 Aug;30(8):861, 863. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9290(97)00034-1.
4
Biomechanical analysis of swing-through gait in paraplegic and non-disabled individuals.截瘫患者和非残疾个体摆动通过步态的生物力学分析。
J Biomech. 1995 Jun;28(6):689-700. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(94)00118-n.
5
Energy expenditure of ambulation using the Sure-Gait crutch and the standard axillary crutch.使用Sure-Gait拐杖和标准腋拐行走时的能量消耗。
Phys Ther. 1990 Jan;70(1):18-23. doi: 10.1093/ptj/70.1.18.
6
The energy expenditure of non-weight bearing crutch walking on the level and ascending stairs.在平地上和上楼梯时使用非负重拐杖行走的能量消耗。
Gait Posture. 2015 Jun;42(1):23-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.10.024. Epub 2015 Feb 25.
7
Gait in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: energy cost analysis.青少年特发性脊柱侧凸的步态:能量消耗分析
Eur Spine J. 2009 Aug;18(8):1160-8. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-1002-0. Epub 2009 Apr 24.
8
Energy efficiency of ambulation-A comparison of various orthopaedic possibilities.行走的能量效率——各种骨科治疗可能性的比较。
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2018 Jul;22(3):622-626. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2017.10.005. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
9
Energy expenditure during ambulation with ortho crutches and axillary crutches.使用矫形拐杖和腋拐行走时的能量消耗。
Phys Ther. 1982 Jun;62(6):813-9. doi: 10.1093/ptj/62.6.813.
10
Pendular model of paraplegic swing-through crutch ambulation.截瘫患者摆动通过式拐杖行走的钟摆模型
J Rehabil Res Dev. 1988 Fall;25(4):1-16.

引用本文的文献

1
Walking with unilateral ankle-foot unloading: a comparative biomechanical analysis of three assistive devices.单侧踝足矫形器支撑下行走的比较生物力学分析。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024 Apr 30;21(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12984-024-01333-w.
2
Functional, Spiroergometric, and Subjective Comparisons Between Forearm Crutches and Hands-Free Single Crutches in a Crossover Study.一项交叉研究中前臂拐杖与免手持单拐杖的功能、运动心肺功能及主观比较
Foot Ankle Orthop. 2023 May 19;8(2):24730114231172734. doi: 10.1177/24730114231172734. eCollection 2023 Apr.
3
Effects of Elbow Crutch Locomotion on Gluteus Medius Activation During Stair Ascending.
上楼梯时使用肘拐行走对臀中肌激活的影响。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 May 25;10:890004. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.890004. eCollection 2022.
4
Effects of Dominant and Nondominant Limb Immobilization on Muscle Activation and Physical Demand during Ambulation with Axillary Crutches.优势侧和非优势侧肢体固定对使用腋拐行走时肌肉激活及身体需求的影响。
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2021 Feb 9;6(1):16. doi: 10.3390/jfmk6010016.
5
Locomotion as a Powerful Model to Study Integrative Physiology: Efficiency, Economy, and Power Relationship.运动作为研究整合生理学的有力模型:效率、经济性与功率关系
Front Physiol. 2018 Dec 11;9:1789. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01789. eCollection 2018.
6
Prospective clinical evaluation of a novel anatomic cuff for forearm crutches in patients with osteoarthritis.新型解剖学袖套在骨关节炎患者前臂拐杖中的前瞻性临床评估。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Mar 14;18(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1459-7.
7
Hand Grip Strength Vs. Sprint Effectiveness in Amputee Soccer Players.截肢足球运动员的握力与短跑效能对比
J Hum Kinet. 2015 Jan 12;48:133-9. doi: 10.1515/hukin-2015-0099. eCollection 2015 Nov 22.
8
Cardiopulmonary response to exercise in COPD and overweight patients: relationship between unloaded cycling and maximal oxygen uptake profiles.慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)和超重患者运动时的心肺反应:无负荷骑行与最大摄氧量曲线之间的关系
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:378469. doi: 10.1155/2015/378469. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
9
Forearm pressure distribution during ambulation with elbow crutches: a cross-sectional study.肘拐步行时前臂压力分布:一项横断面研究。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014 Apr 15;11:61. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-61.
10
Efficiency in cycling: a review.骑行效率:综述
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2009 May;106(1):1-14. doi: 10.1007/s00421-009-1008-7. Epub 2009 Feb 20.