Karch S B, Lewis T, Young S, Hales D, Ho C H
Assistant Medical Examiner, City and County of San Francisco, USA.
Am J Emerg Med. 1996 Nov;14(7):617-9. doi: 10.1016/S0735-6757(96)90073-X.
Neither the success nor the complication rate for field intubation of trauma patients is known with any certainty. A retrospective audit of 94 severely injured patients who required field intubation was undertaken. Fifty percent (13 of 26) of survivors and 67% (37 of 71) of nonsurvivors were successfully intubated in the field (not significant). Mechanism of injury was similar in both groups, but survivors were younger (27 v 60 years, P= .049) and less critically injured, as reflected by their Injury Severity Scale scores, their Trauma Scores, and their field Glasgow Coma Scale scores (22.1 v 30.8, P = .0035; 7.7 v 4.2, P < .0002; and 6.3 v 3.3, P < .0001). When compared with previously published studies of medical patients with cardiac arrest, the success rate was lower in our trauma patients. When compared with patients having similar injuries intubated at the trauma center, field intubation was three times more likely to be associated with the development of nosocomial pneumonia than was hospital intubation.
创伤患者现场插管的成功率和并发症发生率都尚无确切定论。我们对94例需要现场插管的重伤患者进行了一项回顾性审计。现场成功插管的患者中,幸存者占50%(26例中的13例),非幸存者占67%(71例中的37例)(无显著差异)。两组患者的受伤机制相似,但幸存者更年轻(27岁对60岁,P = 0.049),且损伤程度较轻,这从他们的损伤严重程度评分、创伤评分和现场格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分中可以看出(22.1对30.8,P = 0.0035;7.7对4.2,P < 0.0002;6.3对3.3,P < 0.0001)。与之前发表的关于心脏骤停内科患者的研究相比,我们的创伤患者成功率较低。与在创伤中心接受插管的类似损伤患者相比,现场插管发生医院获得性肺炎的可能性是在医院插管的三倍。