Christensen J M, Olsen E
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, National Institute of Occupational Health, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ann Ist Super Sanita. 1996;32(2):285-94.
In most European countries an increasing number of external quality assessment schemes (EQAS) are organized, and it seems appropriate to reinforce collaboration at the European level between organizers of EQAS related to occupational and environmental medicine. Since differences between these EQAS have been recognized, a collaborative project was set up focused on the ways the present occupational and environmental medicine EQAS evaluate results obtained by the same pool of laboratories analysing identical control samples for blood lead. The results confirmed that the samples delivered to the laboratories were homogeneous. Considering the performance as judged by five different schemes the study revealed that laboratories were not ranked identically. For laboratories, which either had a very bad or a very good performance, however, the ranking were comparable. The statistical design of the evaluated EQAS poses problems and requires attention.
在大多数欧洲国家,越来越多的外部质量评估计划(EQAS)被组织起来,加强与职业和环境医学相关的EQAS组织者在欧洲层面的合作似乎是合适的。由于已经认识到这些EQAS之间的差异,因此设立了一个合作项目,重点关注当前职业和环境医学EQAS评估同一组实验室分析相同血铅对照样品所获得结果的方式。结果证实,提供给实验室的样品是均匀的。考虑到由五种不同方案判断的性能,研究表明实验室的排名并不相同。然而,对于表现非常差或非常好的实验室,排名具有可比性。所评估的EQAS的统计设计存在问题,需要予以关注。