Macdougall I C, Tucker B, Thompson J, Tomson C R, Baker L R, Raine A E
Department of Nephrology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, England, United Kingdom.
Kidney Int. 1996 Nov;50(5):1694-9. doi: 10.1038/ki.1996.487.
In view of current uncertainty regarding the optimum route for iron supplementation in patients receiving recombinant human erythropoietin (EPO), a prospective randomized controlled study was designed to investigate this issue. All iron-replete renal failure patients commencing EPO who had a hemoglobin concentration < 8.5 g/dl and an initial serum ferritin level of 100 to 800 micrograms/liter were randomized into three groups with different iron supplementation: Group 1, i.v. iron dextran 5 ml every 2 weeks; Group 2, oral ferrous sulphate 200 mg tds; Group 3, no iron. All patients were treated with 25 U/kg of EPO thrice weekly subcutaneously. The hemoglobin concentration, reticulocyte count, serum ferritin, transferrin saturation, and EPO dose were monitored every two weeks for the first four months. Thirty-seven patients entered the study (12 i.v., 13 oral, 12 no iron). The three groups were equivalent with regard to age, sex, and other demographic details. Even allowing for dosage adjustments, the hemoglobin response in the group receiving i.v. iron (7.3 +/- 0.8 to 11.9 +/- 1.2 g/dl) was significantly greater than that for the other two groups (7.2 +/- 1.1 to 10.2 +/- 1.4 g/dl and 7.3 +/- 0.8 to 9.9 +/- 1.6 g/dl for Groups 2 and 3, respectively; P < 0.005 for both groups vs. Group 1 at 16 weeks). There was no difference between the groups supplemented with oral iron and no iron. Serum ferritin levels remained constant in those receiving i.v. iron (345 +/- 273 to 359 +/- 140 micrograms/liter), in contrast to the other two groups in which ferritin levels fell significantly (309 +/- 218 to 116 +/- 87 micrograms/liter and 458 +/- 206 to 131 +/- 121 micrograms/liter for Groups 2 and 3, respectively; P < 0.0005 for Group 1 vs. Group 2, and P < 0.005 for Group 1 vs. Group 3 at 16 weeks). Dosage requirements of EPO were less in Group 1 (1202 +/- 229 U/kg/16 weeks) than in Group 2 (1294 +/- 314 U/kg/16 weeks) or Group 3 (1475 +/- 311 U/kg/16 weeks; P < 0.05 vs. Group 1). The results of this study suggest that, even in iron-replete patients, those supplemented with i.v. iron have an enhanced hemoglobin response to EPO with better maintenance of iron stores and lower dosage requirements of EPO, compared with those patients receiving oral iron and no iron supplementation.
鉴于目前对于接受重组人促红细胞生成素(EPO)治疗的患者补充铁剂的最佳途径存在不确定性,设计了一项前瞻性随机对照研究来调查这一问题。所有开始接受EPO治疗、血红蛋白浓度<8.5 g/dl且初始血清铁蛋白水平为100至800微克/升的铁储备充足的肾衰竭患者被随机分为三组,给予不同的铁补充方式:第1组,每2周静脉注射右旋糖酐铁5 ml;第2组,口服硫酸亚铁200 mg,每日三次;第3组,不补充铁剂。所有患者每周皮下注射三次25 U/kg的EPO。在最初的四个月里,每两周监测一次血红蛋白浓度、网织红细胞计数、血清铁蛋白、转铁蛋白饱和度和EPO剂量。37名患者进入研究(12名静脉注射组、13名口服组、12名不补充铁剂组)。三组在年龄、性别和其他人口统计学细节方面相当。即使考虑剂量调整,接受静脉注射铁剂组的血红蛋白反应(从7.3±0.8 g/dl升至11.9±1.2 g/dl)仍显著高于其他两组(第2组从7.2±1.1 g/dl升至10.2±1.4 g/dl,第3组从7.3±0.8 g/dl升至9.9±1.6 g/dl;第16周时,两组与第1组相比P均<0.005)。补充口服铁剂组和不补充铁剂组之间无差异。接受静脉注射铁剂的患者血清铁蛋白水平保持稳定(从345±273微克/升升至359±140微克/升),相比之下,其他两组铁蛋白水平显著下降(第2组从309±218微克/升降至116±87微克/升,第3组从458±206微克/升降至131±121微克/升;第16周时,第1组与第2组相比P<0.0005,第1组与第3组相比P<0.005)。第1组的EPO剂量需求(1202±229 U/kg/16周)低于第2组(1294±314 U/kg/16周)或第3组(1475±311 U/kg/16周;与第1组相比P<0.05)。本研究结果表明,即使在铁储备充足的患者中,与接受口服铁剂和不补充铁剂的患者相比,补充静脉注射铁剂的患者对EPO的血红蛋白反应增强,铁储备维持更好,EPO剂量需求更低。