Suppr超能文献

使用间接抗球蛋白技术对两种用于常规抗体筛查的柱凝集技术进行比较。

A comparison of two column agglutination technologies for routine antibody screening using the indirect antiglobulin technique.

作者信息

Byrne T, Nolan T, O'Donnell R

机构信息

Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland.

出版信息

Br J Biomed Sci. 1996 Sep;53(3):193-5.

PMID:8914345
Abstract

Two commercial column agglutination technologies were compared for routine antibody screening using the indirect antiglobulin technique with 1000 heparinised blood samples from a general hospital. The I.D. microtyping system (Diamed) utilises a Sephadex gel, and the Biovue system (Ortho Diagnostics) consists of a column containing minute glass beads. Both systems have antihuman globulin incorporated into them resulting in agglutinates being trapped and allowing free red cells to pass through to the base. The purpose of this study was to compare the two technologies with the minimum amount of variables possible. The spin tube antiglobulin technique was not included in this study as this technology has not been used in this laboratory since January 1991. The systems compared well, despite different serological problems.

摘要

采用间接抗球蛋白技术,使用一家综合医院的1000份肝素化血样,对两种商业柱凝集技术进行常规抗体筛查比较。I.D.微定型系统(达美公司)使用葡聚糖凝胶,而Biovue系统(奥索诊断公司)由一个装有微小玻璃珠的柱组成。两种系统都含有抗人球蛋白,可使凝集物滞留,使游离红细胞通过至底部。本研究的目的是尽可能减少变量来比较这两种技术。本研究未包括试管抗球蛋白技术,因为自1991年1月以来该技术未在本实验室使用。尽管存在不同的血清学问题,但两种系统的比较效果良好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验