Mortensen M B, Scheel-Hincke J D, Madsen M R, Qvist N, Hovendal C
Dept. of Surgical Gastroenterology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark.
Scand J Gastroenterol. 1996 Nov;31(11):1115-9. doi: 10.3109/00365529609036896.
Even though endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) has improved the pretherapeutic staging and assessment of resectability in patients with upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract malignancies, a considerable number of patients still have to undergo unnecessary explorative laparotomy to obtain the final assessment of resectability. The aim of the present study was to evaluate laparoscopic ultrasonography (LUS) and the combination of EUS and LUS in the pretherapeutic study of these patients with special reference to resectability.
Each of 44 patients with esophageal, gastric, or pancreatic cancer was assigned to a treatment-related resectability group based on five different imaging modalities: computer tomography (CT) + ultrasonography (US), EUS, laparoscopy, LUS, and EUS + LUS. The findings with these imaging modalities were compared with intraoperative findings.
Overall group assignment accuracy showed significantly better results for EUS, LUS, and EUS + LUS than for CT + US and laparoscopy. EUS + LUS identified all non-resectable patients, whereas the sensitivity of CT + US, laparoscopy, and EUS were 14%, 36%, and 79%, respectively. Median time consumption for each EUS, laparoscopy, or LUS procedure was less than 25 min, and no complications were seen during or after the EUS, laparoscopy, or LUS procedures.
Preliminary experience with the combination of EUS and LUS for pretherapeutic assessment of upper GI tract malignancies showed that this combination was superior to CT + US, laparoscopy, and EUS. EUS + LUS correctly identified all non-resectable patients, but two overstaged patients also indicated the need for larger prospective studies to identify the indications and the limitations of this new approach.
尽管内镜超声检查(EUS)已改善了上消化道(GI)恶性肿瘤患者的治疗前分期及可切除性评估,但仍有相当数量的患者不得不接受不必要的探查性剖腹手术以获得可切除性的最终评估。本研究的目的是评估腹腔镜超声检查(LUS)以及EUS与LUS联合应用于这些患者治疗前研究中对可切除性的评估。
44例食管癌、胃癌或胰腺癌患者,根据五种不同的成像方式被分配到与治疗相关的可切除性组:计算机断层扫描(CT)+超声检查(US)、EUS、腹腔镜检查、LUS以及EUS + LUS。将这些成像方式的检查结果与术中结果进行比较。
总体而言,EUS、LUS和EUS + LUS的分组准确性显著优于CT + US和腹腔镜检查。EUS + LUS能够识别所有不可切除的患者,而CT + US、腹腔镜检查和EUS的敏感性分别为14%、36%和79%。每次EUS、腹腔镜检查或LUS检查的中位耗时均少于25分钟,且在EUS、腹腔镜检查或LUS检查期间及之后均未出现并发症。
EUS与LUS联合用于上消化道恶性肿瘤治疗前评估的初步经验表明,这种联合方式优于CT + US、腹腔镜检查和EUS。EUS + LUS正确识别了所有不可切除的患者,但有两名分期过高的患者也表明需要进行更大规模的前瞻性研究以确定这种新方法的适应证和局限性。