Schuurman R, Descamps D, Weverling G J, Kaye S, Tijnagel J, Williams I, van Leeuwen R, Tedder R, Boucher C A, Brun-Vezinet F, Loveday C
Eijkman Winkler Institute for Medical Microbiology, Department of Virology, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
J Clin Microbiol. 1996 Dec;34(12):3016-22. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.12.3016-3022.1996.
Three procedures for the quantification of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) RNA from plasma were compared at three laboratories. The comparison involved the Quantiplex branched DNA assay (version 1.0) by Chiron Diagnostics, the NASBA-QT assay by Organon Teknika, and the Amplicor Monitor assay by Roche Molecular Systems. The laboratories performed each of the three assays with the same sets of reconstructed HIV-1-infected human plasma samples, cross-sectionally collected clinical plasma samples and longitudinally collected plasma samples from patients starting zidovudine therapy. Analysis of the reconstruction panel results for interlaboratory variation demonstrated that no laboratory differences in results were detected for any of the assays. A comparison of the reproducibilities of duplicate samples analyzed by batch and in separate assay runs demonstrated that the reproducibilities of the test results were similar within one assay and appeared to be independent of the HIV-1 concentration. The best reproducibility was obtained with the Quantiplex assay, but all three assays demonstrated equal reliability, which was independent of batched or unbatched analysis of replicate samples. Differences in the absolute concentrations calculated were observed for the assays, in particular in the analysis of reconstructed samples. In all assays, similar changes in plasma HIV-1 RNA concentrations were determined for longitudinally collected clinical samples.
在三个实验室对三种定量检测血浆中人类免疫缺陷病毒1型(HIV-1)RNA的方法进行了比较。比较涉及Chiron Diagnostics公司的Quantiplex分支DNA检测法(1.0版)、Organon Teknika公司的NASBA-QT检测法以及Roche Molecular Systems公司的Amplicor Monitor检测法。各实验室使用同一组重构的HIV-1感染人类血浆样本、横断面采集的临床血浆样本以及从开始接受齐多夫定治疗的患者中纵向采集的血浆样本,对这三种检测方法逐一进行检测。对重构样本组结果进行实验室间变异分析表明,任何一种检测方法均未检测到实验室间结果存在差异。对通过批量分析和单独检测运行分析的重复样本的重现性进行比较表明,在一种检测方法内,检测结果的重现性相似,且似乎与HIV-1浓度无关。Quantiplex检测法获得了最佳重现性,但所有三种检测方法均显示出同等的可靠性,这与对重复样本进行批量或非批量分析无关。在各检测方法中,观察到所计算的绝对浓度存在差异,尤其是在对重构样本的分析中。在所有检测方法中,对纵向采集的临床样本测定的血浆HIV-1 RNA浓度变化相似。