Suppr超能文献

直接粪便涂片与两种厚涂片技术在诊断肠道寄生虫感染中的比较。

Comparison of the direct faecal smear and two thick smear techniques for the diagnosis of intestinal parasitic infections.

作者信息

Engels D, Nahimana S, Gryseels B

机构信息

Belgian Technical Co-operation, Bujumbura, Burundi.

出版信息

Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1996 Sep-Oct;90(5):523-5. doi: 10.1016/s0035-9203(96)90304-1.

Abstract

Among 547 health centre patients in Burundi, the diagnostic performance of a glass coverslip modification of the Kato thick smear technique was compared with the combination of direct slide examination and the quick Kato-Katz method, currently recommended in basic health services, for the diagnosis of intestinal parasitic infections. The classical Kato-Katz method performed best for the diagnosis of common helminth infections, especially in combination with direct examination. For the diagnosis of protozoa, both trophozoites and cysts, the direct slide examination was superior to the glass coverslip technique. Despite its being a single and easy procedure, the glass coverslip technique could not be recommended as the method of choice for the diagnosis of intestinal parasites in basic health services.

摘要

在布隆迪的547名健康中心患者中,将加藤厚涂片技术的玻璃盖玻片改良法的诊断性能与目前基础卫生服务中推荐的直接涂片检查和快速加藤-卡茨法相结合的方法进行比较,以诊断肠道寄生虫感染。经典的加藤-卡茨法在诊断常见蠕虫感染方面表现最佳,尤其是与直接检查相结合时。对于原虫(滋养体和包囊)的诊断,直接涂片检查优于玻璃盖玻片技术。尽管玻璃盖玻片技术是一种单一且简便的方法,但在基础卫生服务中,不能推荐将其作为诊断肠道寄生虫的首选方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验