Engels D, Nahimana S, Gryseels B
Belgian Technical Co-operation, Bujumbura, Burundi.
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1996 Sep-Oct;90(5):523-5. doi: 10.1016/s0035-9203(96)90304-1.
Among 547 health centre patients in Burundi, the diagnostic performance of a glass coverslip modification of the Kato thick smear technique was compared with the combination of direct slide examination and the quick Kato-Katz method, currently recommended in basic health services, for the diagnosis of intestinal parasitic infections. The classical Kato-Katz method performed best for the diagnosis of common helminth infections, especially in combination with direct examination. For the diagnosis of protozoa, both trophozoites and cysts, the direct slide examination was superior to the glass coverslip technique. Despite its being a single and easy procedure, the glass coverslip technique could not be recommended as the method of choice for the diagnosis of intestinal parasites in basic health services.
在布隆迪的547名健康中心患者中,将加藤厚涂片技术的玻璃盖玻片改良法的诊断性能与目前基础卫生服务中推荐的直接涂片检查和快速加藤-卡茨法相结合的方法进行比较,以诊断肠道寄生虫感染。经典的加藤-卡茨法在诊断常见蠕虫感染方面表现最佳,尤其是与直接检查相结合时。对于原虫(滋养体和包囊)的诊断,直接涂片检查优于玻璃盖玻片技术。尽管玻璃盖玻片技术是一种单一且简便的方法,但在基础卫生服务中,不能推荐将其作为诊断肠道寄生虫的首选方法。