Krafchek J, Robertson J H, Radford M, Adams D, Kisslo J
Am Heart J. 1985 Oct;110(4):765-73. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(85)90455-7.
To further define the clinical role of continuous wave Doppler echocardiography for determining aortic valve gradient, we studied 60 consecutive adult patients (age range 22 to 81 years, mean age 63) with suspected aortic stenosis within 24 hours of catheterization. Blind comparisons of Doppler peak and mean gradients by the simplified Bernoulli equation were made with catheterization peak-to-peak (r = 0.84), peak (r = 0.87) and mean (r = 0.84) gradients in a double-blind fashion. Despite these favorable correlations, Doppler peak gradient generally overestimated catheterization peak-to-peak gradient (1 to 53 mm Hg), making it impractical for clinical use. Doppler-catheterization correlations of peak and mean gradients were more favorable, with the least scatter noticed for mean gradient. The results of analysis of pooled data indicated that mean gradient may also be most specific for differentiating severe from less severe aortic stenosis. In this consecutive series where a full range of catheterization gradients was encountered, seven patients with predicted Doppler gradients were found to have none, which is best explained by the use of the simplified Bernoulli equation in patients with aortic insufficiency. These data indicate that prudence should be maintained when Doppler gradients alone are used for the assessment of aortic stenosis.
为进一步明确连续波多普勒超声心动图在测定主动脉瓣压差方面的临床作用,我们研究了60例连续的成年患者(年龄范围22至81岁,平均年龄63岁),这些患者在导管插入术24小时内被怀疑患有主动脉瓣狭窄。采用简化伯努利方程对多普勒峰值和平均压差与导管插入术的峰峰值(r = 0.84)、峰值(r = 0.87)和平均(r = 0.84)压差进行双盲比较。尽管有这些良好的相关性,但多普勒峰值压差通常高估了导管插入术的峰峰值压差(1至53毫米汞柱),使其在临床应用中不切实际。多普勒与导管插入术的峰值和平均压差的相关性更好,平均压差的离散度最小。汇总数据分析结果表明,平均压差对于区分重度和轻度主动脉瓣狭窄可能也是最具特异性的。在这个遇到各种导管插入术压差的连续系列中,发现7例预测多普勒压差的患者实际上没有压差,这最好用在主动脉瓣关闭不全患者中使用简化伯努利方程来解释。这些数据表明,仅使用多普勒压差评估主动脉瓣狭窄时应谨慎。