Tong C Y, Valentine C, Arya O P
Department of Medical Microbiology and Genito-Urinary Medicine, University of Liverpool, UK.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1996 Apr;15(4):336-40. doi: 10.1007/BF01695668.
Endourethral swabs and first-pass urine (FPU) samples from 148 male patients were tested for Chlamydia trachomatis by an automated enzyme immunoassay (EIA) (Vidas; bioMérieux, France), a direct fluorescent antibody (DFA) test (MicroTrak; Syva, USA) and two polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods. Chlamydia trachomatis was considered present if a specimen was positive by at least two methods. This expanded criterion identified 27 patients (18%) as truly infected. One of the PCR methods was most sensitive for both types of specimen. When the recommended cut-off value of Vidas was reduced by 50%, its sensitivity on endourethral swabs was comparable to that of the DFA test, but the DFA test performed better with FPU. In general, FPU was suitable only for PCR.
采用自动酶免疫测定法(EIA)(Vidas;法国生物梅里埃公司)、直接荧光抗体(DFA)检测法(MicroTrak;美国Syva公司)以及两种聚合酶链反应(PCR)方法,对148例男性患者的尿道拭子和初段尿(FPU)样本进行沙眼衣原体检测。如果一个样本至少通过两种方法检测为阳性,则认为存在沙眼衣原体感染。这一扩大的标准确定了27例患者(18%)为真正感染。其中一种PCR方法对两种类型的样本最为敏感。当将Vidas推荐的临界值降低50%时,其对尿道拭子的敏感性与DFA检测法相当,但DFA检测法对FPU样本的检测效果更好。总体而言,FPU样本仅适用于PCR检测。