Suppr超能文献

在男性患者诊断标本中,将自动化酶免疫测定法与直接荧光抗体试验及聚合酶链反应检测沙眼衣原体的比较。

Comparison of an automated enzyme immunoassay with a direct fluorescent antibody test and polymerase chain reaction for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in diagnostic specimens from male patients.

作者信息

Tong C Y, Valentine C, Arya O P

机构信息

Department of Medical Microbiology and Genito-Urinary Medicine, University of Liverpool, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1996 Apr;15(4):336-40. doi: 10.1007/BF01695668.

Abstract

Endourethral swabs and first-pass urine (FPU) samples from 148 male patients were tested for Chlamydia trachomatis by an automated enzyme immunoassay (EIA) (Vidas; bioMérieux, France), a direct fluorescent antibody (DFA) test (MicroTrak; Syva, USA) and two polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods. Chlamydia trachomatis was considered present if a specimen was positive by at least two methods. This expanded criterion identified 27 patients (18%) as truly infected. One of the PCR methods was most sensitive for both types of specimen. When the recommended cut-off value of Vidas was reduced by 50%, its sensitivity on endourethral swabs was comparable to that of the DFA test, but the DFA test performed better with FPU. In general, FPU was suitable only for PCR.

摘要

采用自动酶免疫测定法(EIA)(Vidas;法国生物梅里埃公司)、直接荧光抗体(DFA)检测法(MicroTrak;美国Syva公司)以及两种聚合酶链反应(PCR)方法,对148例男性患者的尿道拭子和初段尿(FPU)样本进行沙眼衣原体检测。如果一个样本至少通过两种方法检测为阳性,则认为存在沙眼衣原体感染。这一扩大的标准确定了27例患者(18%)为真正感染。其中一种PCR方法对两种类型的样本最为敏感。当将Vidas推荐的临界值降低50%时,其对尿道拭子的敏感性与DFA检测法相当,但DFA检测法对FPU样本的检测效果更好。总体而言,FPU样本仅适用于PCR检测。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验