• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Comparison of pharyngeal, fecal, and cloacal samples for the isolation of Chlamydia psittaci from experimentally infected cockatiels and turkeys.

作者信息

Andersen A A

机构信息

United States Department of Agriculture, National Animal Disease Center, Ames, IA 50010, USA.

出版信息

J Vet Diagn Invest. 1996 Oct;8(4):448-50. doi: 10.1177/104063879600800407.

DOI:10.1177/104063879600800407
PMID:8953529
Abstract

Direct comparisons were made of chlamydial isolation rates from pharyngeal swabs, fecal samples, and cloacal swabs from cockatiels and pharyngeal and cloacal swabs from turkeys experimentally infected with Chlamydia psittaci. During pathogenesis studies, 133 paired specimens were collected from cockatiels and 118 paired specimens were collected from turkeys. Of the 51 cockatiel chlamydial infections detected, 80.4% were positive by the pharyngeal swab sample, 45.1% were positive by the fecal swab sample, and 37.3% were positive by the cloacal swab sample. Of the 87 turkey infections detected, 93.1% were positive by the pharyngeal swab sample and 77.0% were positive by the cloacal swab. The pharyngeal swabs were the most reliable sample for isolation of chlamydia from live birds. However, no single sampling site yielded positive results from all infected birds. Specimens from multiple sites are recommended because a number of infected birds were identified by isolation from only 1 sample.

摘要

相似文献

1
Comparison of pharyngeal, fecal, and cloacal samples for the isolation of Chlamydia psittaci from experimentally infected cockatiels and turkeys.
J Vet Diagn Invest. 1996 Oct;8(4):448-50. doi: 10.1177/104063879600800407.
2
The prevalence of Chlamydia psittaci infections in Belgian commercial turkey poults.比利时商业火鸡雏鸡中鹦鹉热衣原体感染的患病率。
Vet Microbiol. 1997 Jan;54(1):85-93. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1135(96)01224-2.
3
Direct complement fixation and isolation attempts for detecting Chlamydia psittaci infection of psittacine birds.用于检测鹦鹉鸟类鹦鹉热衣原体感染的直接补体结合及分离尝试。
Avian Dis. 1985 Jul-Sep;29(3):873-7.
4
Evaluation of five immunoassays for detection of Chlamydia psittaci in cloacal and conjunctival specimens from turkeys.评估五种免疫测定法用于检测火鸡泄殖腔和结膜标本中的鹦鹉热衣原体。
J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Jun;32(6):1470-4. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.6.1470-1474.1994.
5
Transmission of Chlamydiae from grackles to turkeys.衣原体从白头翁向火鸡的传播。
Avian Dis. 1978 Apr-Jun;22(2):308-12.
6
Detection of CHLAMYDIA PSITTACI in feral pigeons (COLUMBA LIVIA DOMESTICA) in Slovakia and their characterisation.斯洛伐克野生家鸽(Columba livia domestica)中鹦鹉热衣原体的检测及其特征分析。
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2016;23(1):75-8. doi: 10.5604/12321966.1196856.
7
Prevalence of Chlamydia psittaci in the feral pigeon population of Basel, Switzerland.瑞士巴塞尔野生鸽子群体中鹦鹉热衣原体的流行情况。
J Med Microbiol. 2012 Feb;61(Pt 2):261-265. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.034025-0. Epub 2011 Sep 15.
8
Enigmatic psittacine chlamydiosis: results of serotesting and isolation attempts, 1978 through 1983, and considerations for the future.神秘的鹦鹉衣原体病:1978年至1983年血清检测及分离尝试的结果与对未来的思考
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1985 May 15;186(10):1075-9.
9
Survey on Chlamydiaceae in cloacal swabs from Swiss turkeys demonstrates absence of Chlamydia psittaci and low occurrence of Chlamydia gallinacean.对瑞士火鸡泄殖腔拭子中衣原体科的调查表明,无鹦鹉热衣原体和低水平的禽衣原体感染。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 10;14(12):e0226091. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226091. eCollection 2019.
10
[The occurrence of Chlamydia psittaci infections in raptors from wildlife preserves].[野生动物保护区猛禽中鹦鹉热衣原体感染的发生情况]
Tierarztl Prax. 1993 Jun;21(3):217-24.

引用本文的文献

1
A Outbreak in Psittacine Birds in Sardinia, Italy.意大利撒丁岛的鹦鹉暴发疫情。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 30;19(21):14204. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114204.
2
Experimental Chlamydia gallinacea infection in chickens does not protect against a subsequent experimental Chlamydia psittaci infection.实验性鸡衣原体感染不能保护鸡免受随后的实验性鹦鹉热衣原体感染。
Vet Res. 2021 Nov 20;52(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s13567-021-01011-y.
3
Identification of Campylobacter jejuni and Chlamydia psittaci from cockatiel (Nymphicus hollandicus) using metagenomics.
利用宏基因组学从鸡尾鹦鹉(Nymphicus hollandicus)中鉴定空肠弯曲菌和鹦鹉热衣原体。
BMC Genomics. 2021 Nov 6;22(1):797. doi: 10.1186/s12864-021-08122-y.
4
Detection of in Swiss wild birds sampled at a bird rehabilitation centre.在一家鸟类康复中心对瑞士野生鸟类进行的[检测项目]检测。 (原文中“Detection of ”这里少了具体检测内容)
Vet Rec Open. 2020 Nov 12;7(1):e000437. doi: 10.1136/vetreco-2020-000437. eCollection 2020.
5
Occurrence of in Raptors and Crows in Switzerland.瑞士猛禽和乌鸦体内的出现情况。
Pathogens. 2020 Sep 2;9(9):724. doi: 10.3390/pathogens9090724.
6
: Diseases in Primary Hosts and Zoonosis.主要宿主中的疾病与动物源性疾病
Microorganisms. 2019 May 24;7(5):146. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms7050146.
7
A cross sectional study on Dutch layer farms to investigate the prevalence and potential risk factors for different Chlamydia species.一项针对荷兰蛋鸡养殖场的横断面研究,旨在调查不同衣原体种类的流行情况及潜在风险因素。
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 11;13(1):e0190774. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190774. eCollection 2018.
8
Molecular Detection and Genotyping of Chlamydia psittaci in Captive Psittacines from Costa Rica.哥斯达黎加圈养鹦鹉中鹦鹉热衣原体的分子检测与基因分型
Vet Med Int. 2013;2013:142962. doi: 10.1155/2013/142962. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
9
Combating chlamydiosis.防治衣原体病
Bioeng Bugs. 2010 Jul-Aug;1(4):284-5. doi: 10.4161/bbug.1.4.12117.
10
Pathogen surveillance through monitoring of sewer systems.通过监测下水道系统进行病原体监测。
Adv Appl Microbiol. 2008;65:249-69. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2164(08)00609-6.