Suppr超能文献

危重症患者心输出量的测量:热稀释法、计算法、呼出气法和基于氧耗量法之间的差异

Measuring cardiac output in critically Ill patients: disagreement between thermodilution-, calculated-, expired gas-, and oxygen consumption-based methods.

作者信息

Sherman M S, Kosinski R, Paz H L, Campbell D

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Medical College of Pennslyvania and Hahnemann University, Philadelphia 19102-1192, USA.

出版信息

Cardiology. 1997 Jan-Feb;88(1):19-25. doi: 10.1159/000177304.

Abstract

Calculated values of oxygen consumption have been used to calculate a Fick cardiac output when thermodilution measurements are unreliable and when oxygen consumption measurements are unavailable. To determine the accuracy of these calculations, we measured cardiac output in 20 patients by four methods: (1) a reference Fick cardiac output calculated from metabolic oxygen consumption measurements and arterial-venous oxygen content difference (COmet); (2) thermodilution cardiac output (COtherm), (3) an estimated Fick cardiac output based on calculated oxygen consumption using standard equations (COcalc), and (4) an estimated Fick cardiac output using a bedside measurement of expired carbon dioxide production (COexp). The mean difference +/- 95% limits of agreement between COtherm and COmet was 1.71 +/- 5 liters/min. The mean difference between COcalc and COmet was -0.04 +/- 3.33 liters/min. The mean difference between COexp and COmet was 0.31 +/- 3.01 liters/min. On the basis of these wide confidence intervals, we conclude that (1) thermodilution and metabolic measurements of cardiac output frequently differ in critically ill patients, and (2) estimates of oxygen consumption, based on either standard equations or on expired carbon dioxide production measurements, are poor substitutes for metabolic measurements of oxygen consumption in critically ill subjects and may provide inaccurate estimates of cardiac output.

摘要

当热稀释测量不可靠且无法获得耗氧量测量值时,已使用计算得出的耗氧量来计算菲克心输出量。为了确定这些计算的准确性,我们采用四种方法对20例患者的心输出量进行了测量:(1)根据代谢耗氧量测量值和动静脉氧含量差计算得出的参考菲克心输出量(COmet);(2)热稀释法心输出量(COtherm);(3)使用标准方程根据计算得出的耗氧量估算的菲克心输出量(COcalc);(4)使用床边呼出二氧化碳产量测量值估算的菲克心输出量(COexp)。COtherm与COmet之间的平均差值±95%一致性界限为1.71±5升/分钟。COcalc与COmet之间的平均差值为-0.04±3.33升/分钟。COexp与COmet之间的平均差值为0.31±3.01升/分钟。基于这些宽泛的置信区间,我们得出以下结论:(1)在危重病患者中,心输出量的热稀释测量值与代谢测量值经常存在差异;(2)基于标准方程或呼出二氧化碳产量测量值估算的耗氧量,在危重病患者中不能很好地替代代谢耗氧量测量,并且可能会提供不准确的心输出量估算值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验