Lynch J, Kaemmerer H
University Department of Anesthesiology, Köln, Federal Republic of Germany.
Intensive Care Med. 1990;16(4):248-51. doi: 10.1007/BF01705160.
We compared a modified Fick method for measuring cardiac output against the thermodilution method in 11 critically-ill patients on mechanical ventilation. Oxygen consumption (VO2) was calculated indirectly, by measuring the carbon dioxide elimination (VCO2) during steady state and by assuming an average respiratory quotient of 0.9. For a total of 129 measurements, the mean difference in cardiac output between both methods was 0.03 +/- 1.3 l/min (95% confidence interval, -0.19 to 0.25 l/min, p = 0.7) standard deviation, with the largest differences being measured in the low cardiac output range (less than 5 l/min). No statistically significant difference was found between the cardiac output values obtained with either method. These data showed a good correlation between the two methods and suggest that the modified Fick method may be useful in determining cardiac output in seriously ill patients on mechanical ventilation not requiring pulmonary arterial catheterisation, or where facilities for undertaking metabolic measurements are not available.
我们在11例接受机械通气的重症患者中,将一种改良的测量心输出量的菲克法与热稀释法进行了比较。通过在稳态期间测量二氧化碳排出量(VCO2)并假设平均呼吸商为0.9,间接计算氧耗量(VO2)。在总共129次测量中,两种方法测得的心输出量的平均差异为0.03±1.3升/分钟(95%置信区间,-0.19至0.25升/分钟,p = 0.7)标准差,最大差异出现在低心输出量范围(小于5升/分钟)。两种方法所获得的心输出量值之间未发现统计学上的显著差异。这些数据表明两种方法之间具有良好的相关性,并表明改良的菲克法可能有助于在不需要肺动脉导管插入术或没有进行代谢测量设施的接受机械通气的重症患者中测定心输出量。