• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估社区高血压控制项目的注意事项。

Considerations for evaluating community high blood pressure control programmes.

作者信息

Roccella E J

机构信息

National High Blood Pressure Education Programme, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.

出版信息

J Hum Hypertens. 1996 Feb;10 Suppl 1:S17-9.

PMID:8965281
Abstract

A major reason for building evaluation procedures into community high blood pressure control programmes is the potential to influence programme planning and operation positively. Evaluation can assist smooth, successful implementation of programme plans on a continuous basis. Evaluation can provide for staff development and training and help administrators be accountable to themselves, their staffs, and their clients. Three basis types of evaluation are relevant to hypertension control programmes: process, outcome, and impact. Process evaluation measures programme efforts by assessing, modifying, and reassessing daily operations. This type of evaluation examines the use of resources, patterns of staff interaction, processes used in planning, decision making, or organization of staff to carry out these efforts. Outcome evaluation measures programme effects and extent to which programme achieve results in the target population. This activity helps determine how well programme objectives are achieved and whether activities should be continued, expanded, or redirected. Impact evaluation provides information on the long-term effects of the hypertension control programme on the community at large, such as morbidity and mortality changes. Because of the need for large sample sizes to detect these changes, impact evaluation is not usually conducted by a single community programme. As community programmes grow in number, the competition for resources becomes greater. Legislators will demand more information about programme costs and effectiveness, which will be needed to justify expenditures and compete for additional resources.

摘要

将评估程序纳入社区高血压控制项目的一个主要原因是其有可能对项目规划和运作产生积极影响。评估有助于持续顺利、成功地实施项目计划。评估可为员工发展和培训提供支持,并帮助管理人员对自己、员工和客户负责。有三种基本类型的评估与高血压控制项目相关:过程评估、结果评估和影响评估。过程评估通过评估、修改和重新评估日常运作来衡量项目工作。这种评估类型会审查资源的使用情况、员工互动模式、规划、决策或员工组织实施这些工作所采用的流程。结果评估衡量项目效果以及项目在目标人群中取得成果的程度。这项活动有助于确定项目目标的实现程度以及活动是否应继续、扩大或调整方向。影响评估提供有关高血压控制项目对整个社区的长期影响的信息,例如发病率和死亡率的变化。由于需要大样本量来检测这些变化,影响评估通常不由单个社区项目进行。随着社区项目数量的增加,资源竞争变得更加激烈。立法者将要求提供更多有关项目成本和效益的信息,这对于证明支出合理性和争夺额外资源是必要的。

相似文献

1
Considerations for evaluating community high blood pressure control programmes.评估社区高血压控制项目的注意事项。
J Hum Hypertens. 1996 Feb;10 Suppl 1:S17-9.
2
Evaluation of national malaria control programmes in Africa.非洲国家疟疾控制项目评估
Bull World Health Organ. 1994;72(3):371-81.
3
Reflect before you act: providing structure to the evaluation of rehabilitation programmes.行动前先思考:为康复计划的评估提供框架。
Disabil Rehabil. 2003 Nov 18;25(22):1252-64. doi: 10.1080/09638280310001599970.
4
Does CBE come close to what it should be? A case study from the developing world. Evaluating a programme in action against objectives on paper.基于社区的教育(CBE)是否接近其应有的状态?来自发展中世界的一个案例研究。根据书面目标评估一个正在实施的项目。
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2005 Jul;18(2):194-208. doi: 10.1080/13576280500148205.
5
Lessons from worldwide experience with hypertension control.
J Hum Hypertens. 1996 Feb;10 Suppl 1:S21-5.
6
Reducing obesity and related chronic disease risk in children and youth: a synthesis of evidence with 'best practice' recommendations.降低儿童和青少年肥胖及相关慢性病风险:证据综合与“最佳实践”建议
Obes Rev. 2006 Feb;7 Suppl 1:7-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2006.00242.x.
7
Gains and losses of structured information collection in the evaluation of 'rehabilitation in the community' programmes: ten lessons learnt during actual evaluations.“社区康复”项目评估中结构化信息收集的得与失:实际评估过程中的十条经验教训
Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(5):396-404. doi: 10.1080/09638280701256272.
8
[Community-based health promotion--a challenge for the evaluation].[基于社区的健康促进——评估面临的挑战]
Gesundheitswesen. 2007 Feb;69(2):77-87. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-970146.
9
Quality evaluation in the management of child sponsorship programmes.儿童赞助项目管理中的质量评估。
J Trop Med Hyg. 1994 Aug;97(4):199-204.
10
[Choice of nutritional interventions in Congo: an approach for primary health care centres and for the community].刚果营养干预措施的选择:基层医疗中心及社区的一种方法
Sante. 2002 Jan-Mar;12(1):100-6.